Luteal supplementation in in vitro fertilization: more questions than answers

Ziad R. Hubayter, Suheil J. Muasher

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

56 Scopus citations


Objective: To update clinicians on different regimens of luteal phase supplementation in IVF-stimulated cycles and to identify areas that need further research in this subject. Design: Literature review and critical analysis of published studies on luteal phase supplementation during the last 20 years. Conclusion(s): Luteal phase supplementation in IVF-stimulated cycles, both in gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist and antagonist protocols, is considered an essential requirement for optimal success rates. The date of initiation and discontinuation of supplemented hormones is not adequately studied in the literature. In most major controlled and randomized studies, there are no significant differences in success rates with progesterone supplementation alone, progesterone and estradiol, progesterone and human chorionic gonadotropin, and human chorionic gonadotropin alone. Success rates seem similar with intramuscular and vaginal progesterone administration with patient preference for the vaginal route. The optimal dose of progesterone has not been studied in a scientific way in the literature. The use of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists for luteal phase supplementation in antagonist cycles appears to be promising, and is worthy of further investigation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)749-758
Number of pages10
JournalFertility and sterility
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 2008
Externally publishedYes


  • Luteal phase supplementation
  • estradiol
  • gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and antagonists
  • human chorionic gonadotropin
  • in vitro fertilization
  • progesterone

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology


Dive into the research topics of 'Luteal supplementation in in vitro fertilization: more questions than answers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this