TY - JOUR
T1 - Lower extremity physical performance, self-reported mobility difficulty, and use of compensatory strategies for mobility by elderly women
AU - Ganesh, Shanti Portia
AU - Fried, Linda P.
AU - Taylor, Donald H.
AU - Pieper, Carl F.
AU - Hoenig, Helen M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported in part by the National Institutes of Health , National Institute on Aging (NIH/NIA), Duke University Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (grant no. P30AG028716 ), and by the Women's Health and Aging Study (NIH/NIA contract N01-AG12112 and R37AG019905). This research was completed as part of the Mobility Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center, which is funded by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the U.S. Department of Education (grant no. H133E080003 ). The opinions contained in this presentation are those of the grantee and do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Department of Education.
PY - 2011/2
Y1 - 2011/2
N2 - Objective To describe the relationship between lower extremity physical performance, self-reported mobility difficulty, and self-reported use of compensatory strategies (CSs) for mobility inside the home. Design Cross-sectional exploratory study. Setting Community-dwelling elders. Participants Disabled, cognitively intact women 65 years or older (N=1002), from the Women's Health and Aging Study I. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures CS scale: no CS, behavioral modifications (BMs) only, durable medical equipment (DME) with or without use of BMs, and any use of human help (HH); and 3 dichotomous CS measures: any CS (vs none); DME+HH (vs BMs only, among users of any CS); any HH (vs DME only, among users of any DME/HH). Results Self-reported mobility difficulty and physical performance were significantly correlated with one another (r=-.57, P<.0001) and with the CS scale ([r=.51, P<.001] and [r=-.54, P<.0001], respectively). Sequential logistic regressions showed self-reported difficulty and physical performance were significant independent predictors of each category of CS. For the any CS and DME+HH models, the odds ratio for self-reported difficulty decreased by approximately 50% when physical performance was included in the model, compared with difficulty alone ([18.0 to 8.6] and [7.3 to 3.8], respectively), but both physical performance and difficulty remained significant predictors (P<.0001). The effects of covariates differed for the various CS categories, with some covariates having independent relationships to CS, and others appearing to have moderating or mediating effects on the relationship of self-reported difficulty or physical performance to CS. Conclusions Physical performance, self-reported difficulty, health conditions, and contextual factors have complex effects on the way elders carry out mobility inside the home.
AB - Objective To describe the relationship between lower extremity physical performance, self-reported mobility difficulty, and self-reported use of compensatory strategies (CSs) for mobility inside the home. Design Cross-sectional exploratory study. Setting Community-dwelling elders. Participants Disabled, cognitively intact women 65 years or older (N=1002), from the Women's Health and Aging Study I. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures CS scale: no CS, behavioral modifications (BMs) only, durable medical equipment (DME) with or without use of BMs, and any use of human help (HH); and 3 dichotomous CS measures: any CS (vs none); DME+HH (vs BMs only, among users of any CS); any HH (vs DME only, among users of any DME/HH). Results Self-reported mobility difficulty and physical performance were significantly correlated with one another (r=-.57, P<.0001) and with the CS scale ([r=.51, P<.001] and [r=-.54, P<.0001], respectively). Sequential logistic regressions showed self-reported difficulty and physical performance were significant independent predictors of each category of CS. For the any CS and DME+HH models, the odds ratio for self-reported difficulty decreased by approximately 50% when physical performance was included in the model, compared with difficulty alone ([18.0 to 8.6] and [7.3 to 3.8], respectively), but both physical performance and difficulty remained significant predictors (P<.0001). The effects of covariates differed for the various CS categories, with some covariates having independent relationships to CS, and others appearing to have moderating or mediating effects on the relationship of self-reported difficulty or physical performance to CS. Conclusions Physical performance, self-reported difficulty, health conditions, and contextual factors have complex effects on the way elders carry out mobility inside the home.
KW - Geriatrics
KW - Rehabilitation
KW - Self-help devices
KW - Walking
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79251603904&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79251603904&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.10.012
DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.10.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 21272718
AN - SCOPUS:79251603904
SN - 0003-9993
VL - 92
SP - 228
EP - 235
JO - Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
JF - Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
IS - 2
ER -