Abstract
Objectives: This study explores the nexus between low self-control and legal cynicism among a recent sample of at-risk youth while accounting for various features of direct and vicarious police stops. Methods: Analyses are based on data from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study, which employs a national sample of urban-born, at-risk youth. Results: A uniquely potent association between low self-control and legal cynicism emerged across samples with and without exposure to vicarious or direct police stops. Furthermore, among youth exposed to police stops, the link between low self-control and legal cynicism was largely robust to perceptions/features of these stops, including the degree of officer intrusiveness, arrest, perceptions of procedural justice, and youth feelings of social stigma following the stop. Conclusions: Programmatic efforts that both enhance the early development of self-control through mindfulness and curriculum-based interventions (e.g., Promoting Alternative THinking Strategies) and facilitate trauma-informed policing may be beneficial in curtailing the development of legal cynicism.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 741-783 |
Number of pages | 43 |
Journal | Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency |
Volume | 57 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 1 2020 |
Keywords
- intrusiveness
- legal cynicism
- policing
- procedural justice
- self-control
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology