Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Low ligation has a lower anastomotic leakage rate after rectal cancer surgery

  • Jia Nan Chen
  • , Zheng Liu
  • , Zhi Jie Wang
  • , Fu Qiang Zhao
  • , Fang Ze Wei
  • , Shi Wen Mei
  • , Hai Yu Shen
  • , Juan Li
  • , Wei Pei
  • , Zheng Wang
  • , Jun Yu
  • , Qian Liu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND For laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery, the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) can be ligated at its origin from the aorta [high ligation (HL)] or distally to the origin of the left colic artery [low ligation (LL)]. Whether different ligation levels are related to different postoperative complications, operation time, and lymph node yield remains controversial. Therefore, we designed this study to determine the effects of different ligation levels in rectal cancer surgery. AIM To investigate the operative results following HL and LL of the IMA in rectal cancer patients. METHODS From January 2017 to July 2019, this retrospective cohort study collected information from 462 consecutive rectal cancer patients. According to the ligation level, 235 patients were assigned to the HL group while 227 patients were assigned to the LL group. Data regarding the clinical characteristics, surgical characteristics and complications, pathological outcomes and postoperative recovery were obtained and compared between the two groups. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the possible risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL). RESULTS Compared to the HL group, the LL group had a significantly lower AL rate, with 6 (2.8%) cases in the LL group and 24 (11.0%) cases in the HL group (P = 0.001). The HL group also had a higher diverting stoma rate (16.5% vs 7.5%, P = 0.003). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was subsequently performed to adjust for the confounding factors and confirmed that HL (OR = 3.599; 95%CI: 1.374- 9.425; P = 0.009), tumor located below the peritoneal reflection (OR = 2.751; 95%CI: 0.772-3.985; P = 0.031) and age (= 65 years) (OR = 2.494; 95%CI: 1.080- 5.760; P = 0.032) were risk factors for AL. There were no differences in terms of patient demographics, pathological outcomes, lymph nodes harvested, blood loss, hospital stay and urinary function (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION In rectal cancer surgery, LL should be the preferred method, as it has a lower AL and diverting stoma rate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)632-641
Number of pages10
JournalWorld Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology
Volume12
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020

Keywords

  • Anastomotic leakage
  • Inferior mesenteric artery
  • Laparoscopy
  • Ligation
  • Postoperative complications
  • Rectal neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Gastroenterology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Low ligation has a lower anastomotic leakage rate after rectal cancer surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this