TY - JOUR
T1 - Longitudinally and inter-site consistent multi-atlas based parcellation of brain anatomy using harmonized atlases
AU - Erus, Guray
AU - Doshi, Jimit
AU - An, Yang
AU - Verganelakis, Dimitris
AU - Resnick, Susan M.
AU - Davatzikos, Christos
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (grant number R01-AG014971 ), and by the Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, NIH . We would like to thank Dr. Murat Bilgel for his valuable comments and suggestions in the writing of this article.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2018/2/1
Y1 - 2018/2/1
N2 - As longitudinal and multi-site studies become increasingly frequent in neuroimaging, maintaining longitudinal and inter-scanner consistency of brain parcellation has become a major challenge due to variation in scanner models and/or image acquisition protocols across scanners and sites. We present a new automated segmentation method specifically designed to achieve a consistent parcellation of anatomical brain structures in such heterogeneous datasets. Our method combines a site-specific atlas creation strategy with a state-of-the-art multi-atlas anatomical label fusion framework. Site-specific atlases are computed such that they preserve image intensity characteristics of each site's scanner and acquisition protocol, while atlas pairs share anatomical labels in a way consistent with inter-scanner acquisition variations. This harmonization of atlases improves inter-study and longitudinal consistency of segmentations in the subsequent consensus labeling step. We tested this approach on a large sample of older adults from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA) who had longitudinal scans acquired using two scanners that vary with respect to vendor and image acquisition protocol. We compared the proposed method to standard multi-atlas segmentation for both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. The harmonization significantly reduced scanner-related differences in the age trends of ROI volumes, improved longitudinal consistency of segmentations, and resulted in higher across-scanner intra-class correlations, particularly in the white matter.
AB - As longitudinal and multi-site studies become increasingly frequent in neuroimaging, maintaining longitudinal and inter-scanner consistency of brain parcellation has become a major challenge due to variation in scanner models and/or image acquisition protocols across scanners and sites. We present a new automated segmentation method specifically designed to achieve a consistent parcellation of anatomical brain structures in such heterogeneous datasets. Our method combines a site-specific atlas creation strategy with a state-of-the-art multi-atlas anatomical label fusion framework. Site-specific atlases are computed such that they preserve image intensity characteristics of each site's scanner and acquisition protocol, while atlas pairs share anatomical labels in a way consistent with inter-scanner acquisition variations. This harmonization of atlases improves inter-study and longitudinal consistency of segmentations in the subsequent consensus labeling step. We tested this approach on a large sample of older adults from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA) who had longitudinal scans acquired using two scanners that vary with respect to vendor and image acquisition protocol. We compared the proposed method to standard multi-atlas segmentation for both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. The harmonization significantly reduced scanner-related differences in the age trends of ROI volumes, improved longitudinal consistency of segmentations, and resulted in higher across-scanner intra-class correlations, particularly in the white matter.
KW - Longitudinal
KW - MRI
KW - Multi-atlas segmentation
KW - Protocol differences
KW - ROI
KW - Scanner
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032702105&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032702105&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.026
DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.026
M3 - Article
C2 - 29107121
AN - SCOPUS:85032702105
SN - 1053-8119
VL - 166
SP - 71
EP - 78
JO - NeuroImage
JF - NeuroImage
ER -