TY - JOUR
T1 - Lipid Management Guidelines from the Departments of Veteran Affairs and Defense
T2 - A Critique
AU - Bennet, Catherine S.
AU - Dahagam, Chanukya R.
AU - Virani, Salim S.
AU - Martin, Seth S.
AU - Blumenthal, Roger S.
AU - Michos, Erin D.
AU - McEvoy, John W.
N1 - Funding Information:
Conflict of Interest: SSM is listed as a co-inventor on a pending patent filed by Johns Hopkins University for the novel method of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol estimation; has grant support from the PJ Schafer Cardiovascular Research Fund, American Heart Association, Aetna Foundation, and Google, outside the scope of this article; has received honoraria from the American College of Cardiology for dyslipidemia-related educational activities; and has served as a consultant to Pressed Juicery, Abbott Nutrition, and the Pew Research Center. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the Department of Defense.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2016/9/1
Y1 - 2016/9/1
N2 - In December 2014, the US Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense (VA/DoD) published an independent clinical practice guideline for the management of dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease risk, adding to the myriad of recently published guidelines on this topic. The VA/DoD guidelines differ from major US guidelines published by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association in 2013 in the following ways: recommending moderate-intensity statins for the majority of patients with statin indications regardless of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk; advocating for limited on-treatment lipid monitoring; and deemphasizing ancillary data, such as coronary artery calcium testing, to improve atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk estimation. In the context of manifold treatment recommendations from numerous guideline committees, the VA/DoD recommendations may generate further confusion and mixed messages among healthcare providers about the optimal treatment of dyslipidemia. In this review, we critically appraise the VA/DoD recommendations with a focus on the evidence base for each area where the VA/DoD guidelines differ from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines. We also call for harmonization of lipid treatment guidelines to ensure high-quality and consistent care for patients with, and at risk for, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
AB - In December 2014, the US Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense (VA/DoD) published an independent clinical practice guideline for the management of dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease risk, adding to the myriad of recently published guidelines on this topic. The VA/DoD guidelines differ from major US guidelines published by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association in 2013 in the following ways: recommending moderate-intensity statins for the majority of patients with statin indications regardless of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk; advocating for limited on-treatment lipid monitoring; and deemphasizing ancillary data, such as coronary artery calcium testing, to improve atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk estimation. In the context of manifold treatment recommendations from numerous guideline committees, the VA/DoD recommendations may generate further confusion and mixed messages among healthcare providers about the optimal treatment of dyslipidemia. In this review, we critically appraise the VA/DoD recommendations with a focus on the evidence base for each area where the VA/DoD guidelines differ from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines. We also call for harmonization of lipid treatment guidelines to ensure high-quality and consistent care for patients with, and at risk for, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
KW - Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease
KW - Coronary artery calcium
KW - Dyslipidemia
KW - Guidelines
KW - Veterans Affairs
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973544972&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973544972&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.04.012
DO - 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.04.012
M3 - Review article
C2 - 27154781
AN - SCOPUS:84973544972
SN - 0002-9343
VL - 129
SP - 906
EP - 912
JO - American Journal of Medicine
JF - American Journal of Medicine
IS - 9
ER -