TY - JOUR
T1 - Left ventricular wall thickness in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
T2 - a comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography
AU - Corona-Villalobos, Celia P.
AU - Sorensen, Lars L.
AU - Pozios, Iraklis
AU - Chu, Linda
AU - Eng, John
AU - Abraham, Maria Roselle
AU - Abraham, Theodore P.
AU - Kamel, Ihab R.
AU - Zimmerman, Stefan L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
PY - 2016/6/1
Y1 - 2016/6/1
N2 - We assessed whether cardiac MRI (CMR) and echocardiography (echo) have significant differences measuring left ventricular (LV) wall thickness (WT) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) as performed in the clinical routine. Retrospectively identified, clinically diagnosed HCM patients with interventricular-septal (IVS) pattern hypertrophy who underwent CMR and echo within the same day were included. Left Ventricular WT was measured by CMR in two planes and compared to both echo and contrast echo (cecho). 72 subjects, mean age 50.7 ± 16.2 years, 68 % males. Interventricular septal WT by echo and CMR planes showed good to excellent correlation. However, measurements of the postero-lateral wall showed poor correlation. Bland–Altman plots showed greater maximal IVS WT by echo compared to CMR measurement [SAX = 1.7 mm (−5.8, 9.3); LVOT = 1.1 mm (−5.6, 7.8)]. Differences were smaller between cecho and CMR [SAX = 0.8 mm (−9.2, 10.8); LVOT = −0.2 mm (−10.0, 9.6)]. Severity of WT by quartiles showed greater differences between echo and SAX CMR WT compared to cecho. Echocardiography typically measures greater WT than CMR, with the largest differences in moderate to severe hypertrophy. Contrast echocardiography more closely approximates CMR measurements of WT. These findings have potential clinical implications for risk stratification of subjects with HCM.
AB - We assessed whether cardiac MRI (CMR) and echocardiography (echo) have significant differences measuring left ventricular (LV) wall thickness (WT) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) as performed in the clinical routine. Retrospectively identified, clinically diagnosed HCM patients with interventricular-septal (IVS) pattern hypertrophy who underwent CMR and echo within the same day were included. Left Ventricular WT was measured by CMR in two planes and compared to both echo and contrast echo (cecho). 72 subjects, mean age 50.7 ± 16.2 years, 68 % males. Interventricular septal WT by echo and CMR planes showed good to excellent correlation. However, measurements of the postero-lateral wall showed poor correlation. Bland–Altman plots showed greater maximal IVS WT by echo compared to CMR measurement [SAX = 1.7 mm (−5.8, 9.3); LVOT = 1.1 mm (−5.6, 7.8)]. Differences were smaller between cecho and CMR [SAX = 0.8 mm (−9.2, 10.8); LVOT = −0.2 mm (−10.0, 9.6)]. Severity of WT by quartiles showed greater differences between echo and SAX CMR WT compared to cecho. Echocardiography typically measures greater WT than CMR, with the largest differences in moderate to severe hypertrophy. Contrast echocardiography more closely approximates CMR measurements of WT. These findings have potential clinical implications for risk stratification of subjects with HCM.
KW - Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Echocardiography
KW - Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
KW - Inter-study variability
KW - Wall thickness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958767600&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958767600&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10554-016-0858-4
DO - 10.1007/s10554-016-0858-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 26896038
AN - SCOPUS:84958767600
SN - 1569-5794
VL - 32
SP - 945
EP - 954
JO - International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
JF - International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
IS - 6
ER -