Leaving no culture undrawn: Time to revisit the CLABSI and CAUTI metrics

Sarah E. Nelson, Spyridoula Tsetsou, John Liang

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are quality metrics for many ICUs, and financial ramifications can be applied to hospitals and providers who perform poorly on these measures. Despite some perceived benefits to tracking these metrics, there are a range of issues associated with this practice: lack of a solid evidence base that documenting them has led to decreased infection rates, moral distress associated with identifying these infections, problems with their definitions, and others. We discuss each of these concerns while also including international perspectives then recommend practical steps to attempt to remediate use of the CLABSI and CAUTI metrics. Specifically, we suggest forming a task force consisting of key stakeholders (e.g., providers, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), patients/families) to review CLABSI and CAUTI-related issues and then to create a summary statement containing recommendations to improve the use of these metrics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number154442
JournalJournal of Critical Care
Volume79
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2024

Keywords

  • CAUTI
  • CLABSI
  • Ethics
  • Infection
  • Intensive care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Leaving no culture undrawn: Time to revisit the CLABSI and CAUTI metrics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this