TY - JOUR
T1 - Learned vocalizations in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus)
T2 - The relationship between contact calls and warble song
AU - Tu, Hsiao Wei
AU - Osmanski, Michael S.
AU - Dooling, Robert J.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Steven Brauth and Elizabeth Brittan-Powell for many helpful comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by NIH/NIDCD DC-00198 and DC-04664 to RJD and NIH grant DC-006766 to MSO.
PY - 2011/4
Y1 - 2011/4
N2 - The budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus) has an extraordinarily complex, learned, vocal repertoire consisting of both the long rambling warble song of males and a number of short calls produced by both sexes. In warble, the most common elements (>30%) bear a strong resemblance to the highly frequency-modulated, learned contact calls that the birds produce as single utterances. However, aside from this apparent similarity, little else is known about the relationship between contact calls and warble call elements. Here, both types of calls were recorded from four male budgerigars. Signal analysis and psychophysical testing procedures showed that the acoustic features of these two vocalizations were acoustically different and perceived as distinctive vocalizations by birds. This suggests that warble call elements are not simple insertions of contact calls but are most likely different acoustic elements, created de novo, and used solely in warble. Results show that, like contact calls, warble call elements contain information about signaler identity. The fact that contact calls and warble call elements are acoustically and perceptually distinct suggests that they probably represent two phonological systems in the budgerigar vocal repertoire, both of which arise by production learning.
AB - The budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus) has an extraordinarily complex, learned, vocal repertoire consisting of both the long rambling warble song of males and a number of short calls produced by both sexes. In warble, the most common elements (>30%) bear a strong resemblance to the highly frequency-modulated, learned contact calls that the birds produce as single utterances. However, aside from this apparent similarity, little else is known about the relationship between contact calls and warble call elements. Here, both types of calls were recorded from four male budgerigars. Signal analysis and psychophysical testing procedures showed that the acoustic features of these two vocalizations were acoustically different and perceived as distinctive vocalizations by birds. This suggests that warble call elements are not simple insertions of contact calls but are most likely different acoustic elements, created de novo, and used solely in warble. Results show that, like contact calls, warble call elements contain information about signaler identity. The fact that contact calls and warble call elements are acoustically and perceptually distinct suggests that they probably represent two phonological systems in the budgerigar vocal repertoire, both of which arise by production learning.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79954531130&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79954531130&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1121/1.3557035
DO - 10.1121/1.3557035
M3 - Article
C2 - 21476684
AN - SCOPUS:79954531130
SN - 0001-4966
VL - 129
SP - 2289
EP - 2297
JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
IS - 4
ER -