TY - JOUR
T1 - Laser angioplasty of restenosed coronary stents
T2 - Results of a multicenter surveillance trial
AU - Köster, Ralf
AU - Hamm, Christian W.
AU - Seabra-Gomes, Ricardo
AU - Herrmann, Gunhild
AU - Sievert, Horst
AU - Macaya, Carlos
AU - Fleck, Eckart
AU - Fischer, Klaus
AU - Bonnier, Johannes J R M
AU - Fajadet, Jean
AU - Waigand, J. ürgen
AU - Kuck, Karl Heinz
AU - Henry, Michel
AU - Morice, Marie Claude
AU - Pizzulli, Luciano
AU - Webb-Peploe, Michael M.
AU - Buchwald, Arnd B.
AU - Ekström, Lars
AU - Grube, Eberhard
AU - Al Kasab, Saad
AU - Colombo, Antonio
AU - Sanati, Archimedes
AU - Ernst, Sjef M P G
AU - Haude, Michael
AU - Leon, Martin B.
AU - Ilsley, Charles
AU - Beyar, Rafael
AU - Taeymans, Yvo
AU - Gladbach, Uwe
AU - Wegscheider, Karl
AU - Serruys, Patrick W.
PY - 1999/7
Y1 - 1999/7
N2 - OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated safety and efficacy of excimer laser angioplasty for treatment of restenosed or occluded coronary stents. BACKGROUND: Balloon angioplasty of in-stent restenosis is limited by a high recurrence rate. Debulking by laser angioplasty is a novel concept to treat in-stent restenosis. METHODS: A total of 440 patients with restenoses or occlusions in 527 stents were enrolled for treatment with concentric or eccentric laser catheters and adjunctive balloon angioplasty. RESULTS: Laser angioplasty success (≤50% diameter stenosis after laser treatment or successful passage with a 2.0-mm or 1.7-mm eccentric laser catheter) was achieved in 92% of patients. Adjunctive balloon angioplasty was performed in 99%. Procedural success (laser angioplasty success followed by ≤30% stenosis with or without balloon angioplasty) was 91%. There was neither a significant difference in success with respect to lesion length, nor were there differences between small and large vessels or native vessels and vein grafts. Success was higher and residual stenosis lower using large or eccentric catheters. Serious adverse events included death (1.6%, not directly laser catheter related), Q-wave myocardial infarction (0.5%), non-Q- wave infarction (2.7%), cardiac tamponade (0.5%) and stent damage (0.5%) . Perforations after laser treatment occurred in 0.9% of patients and after balloon angioplasty in 0.2%. Dissections were visible in 4.8% of patients after laser treatment and in 9.3% after balloon angioplasty. Reinterventions during hospitalization were necessary in 0.9% of patients; bypass surgery was performed in 0.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Excimer laser angioplasty with adjunctive balloon angioplasty is a safe and efficient technology to treat in-stent restenoses. These data justify a randomized comparison with balloon angioplasty.
AB - OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated safety and efficacy of excimer laser angioplasty for treatment of restenosed or occluded coronary stents. BACKGROUND: Balloon angioplasty of in-stent restenosis is limited by a high recurrence rate. Debulking by laser angioplasty is a novel concept to treat in-stent restenosis. METHODS: A total of 440 patients with restenoses or occlusions in 527 stents were enrolled for treatment with concentric or eccentric laser catheters and adjunctive balloon angioplasty. RESULTS: Laser angioplasty success (≤50% diameter stenosis after laser treatment or successful passage with a 2.0-mm or 1.7-mm eccentric laser catheter) was achieved in 92% of patients. Adjunctive balloon angioplasty was performed in 99%. Procedural success (laser angioplasty success followed by ≤30% stenosis with or without balloon angioplasty) was 91%. There was neither a significant difference in success with respect to lesion length, nor were there differences between small and large vessels or native vessels and vein grafts. Success was higher and residual stenosis lower using large or eccentric catheters. Serious adverse events included death (1.6%, not directly laser catheter related), Q-wave myocardial infarction (0.5%), non-Q- wave infarction (2.7%), cardiac tamponade (0.5%) and stent damage (0.5%) . Perforations after laser treatment occurred in 0.9% of patients and after balloon angioplasty in 0.2%. Dissections were visible in 4.8% of patients after laser treatment and in 9.3% after balloon angioplasty. Reinterventions during hospitalization were necessary in 0.9% of patients; bypass surgery was performed in 0.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Excimer laser angioplasty with adjunctive balloon angioplasty is a safe and efficient technology to treat in-stent restenoses. These data justify a randomized comparison with balloon angioplasty.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033165559&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033165559&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00167-9
DO - 10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00167-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 10399988
AN - SCOPUS:0033165559
SN - 0735-1097
VL - 34
SP - 25
EP - 32
JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
IS - 1
ER -