TY - JOUR
T1 - Keratocyte Loss after Different Methods of De-epithelialization
AU - Campos, Mauro
AU - Raman, Steve
AU - Lee, Martha
AU - McDonnell, Peter J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Originally received: December 3, 1992. Revision accepted: November 8, 1993. From the Doheny Eye Institute, and the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles. The authors have no proprietary interest in or receive consultant fees from the manufacturers of any instruments or products mentioned. Supported in part by a grant from the Autry Foundation, Los Angeles, California, and by an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc, New York, New York. Dr. McDonnell is a Research to Prevent Blindness William and Mary Greve International Research Scholar. Reprint requests to Peter J. McDonnell, MD, Doheny Eye Institute, 1450 San Pablo St, Los Angeles, CA 90033.
PY - 1994
Y1 - 1994
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the response of corneal stromal cells to different types of superficial injury. Methods: Twenty-two rabbits were randomized into five groups of four (with 2 untreated controls), and their corneas de-epithelialized (1) with a blunt instrument alone; (2) with an instrument and application of 100% ethanol, 0.5% proparacaine, or 4% cocaine; or (3) with the excimer laser. Twenty-four hours after surgery, the eyes were enucleated, and histologic changes were quantitated. Results: All the methods of de-epithelialization used resulted in a decrease in the number of keratocytes relative to the control numbers (P = 0.0001). There is a significantly greater decrease in keratocyte counts with 0.5% proparacaine and 100% ethanol when compared with eyes injured by mechanical means, with 4% cocaine, or with the excimer laser (P = 0.009). All treatment groups showed more polymorphonuclear leukocytes than did controls (P < 0.0001). Mechanical de-epithelialization alone or in conjunction with proparacaine produced the least inflammatory response, but de-epithelialization with the laser was associated with a greater inflammatory response (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: All methods of de-epithelialization produced a significant decrease in rabbit cornea stromal keratocytes 24 hours after injury, associated with acute inflammation. Thus, it may be appropriate to avoid using chemicals, or if chemicals are used, to at least avoid using 100% ethanol. The applicability of these findings to humans has not yet been established.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate the response of corneal stromal cells to different types of superficial injury. Methods: Twenty-two rabbits were randomized into five groups of four (with 2 untreated controls), and their corneas de-epithelialized (1) with a blunt instrument alone; (2) with an instrument and application of 100% ethanol, 0.5% proparacaine, or 4% cocaine; or (3) with the excimer laser. Twenty-four hours after surgery, the eyes were enucleated, and histologic changes were quantitated. Results: All the methods of de-epithelialization used resulted in a decrease in the number of keratocytes relative to the control numbers (P = 0.0001). There is a significantly greater decrease in keratocyte counts with 0.5% proparacaine and 100% ethanol when compared with eyes injured by mechanical means, with 4% cocaine, or with the excimer laser (P = 0.009). All treatment groups showed more polymorphonuclear leukocytes than did controls (P < 0.0001). Mechanical de-epithelialization alone or in conjunction with proparacaine produced the least inflammatory response, but de-epithelialization with the laser was associated with a greater inflammatory response (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: All methods of de-epithelialization produced a significant decrease in rabbit cornea stromal keratocytes 24 hours after injury, associated with acute inflammation. Thus, it may be appropriate to avoid using chemicals, or if chemicals are used, to at least avoid using 100% ethanol. The applicability of these findings to humans has not yet been established.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028242857&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028242857&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0161-6420(94)31242-5
DO - 10.1016/S0161-6420(94)31242-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 8190476
AN - SCOPUS:0028242857
SN - 0161-6420
VL - 101
SP - 890
EP - 894
JO - Ophthalmology
JF - Ophthalmology
IS - 5
ER -