TY - JOUR
T1 - It’s not me, it’s you - Differential neural processing of social and non-social nogo cues in joint action
AU - Peterburs, Jutta
AU - Liepelt, Roman
AU - Voegler, Rolf
AU - Ocklenburg, Sebastian
AU - Straube, Thomas
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Vanessa Löw and Anna Borgolte for help with data acquisition and analysis. This work was supported by grants awarded by the German Research Society (DFG; Pe2077/3-1 awarded to J.P., and LI 2115/1-3 awarded to R.L).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2019/1/2
Y1 - 2019/1/2
N2 - This study used a joint flanker task to investigate differences in processing of social and non-social nogo cues, i.e., between cues indicating that a co-actor should respond and cues signaling that neither actor nor co-actor should respond, using event-related potentials (ERPs) and trial-to-trial response times (RTs). It was hypothesized that a social co-actor’s response should be reflected in stronger modulation (slower RTs on subsequent trials; augmented neural responses) for social compared to non-social nogo. RTs and ERPs replicated flanker compatibility effects, with faster responses and increased P3a on compatible trials. In line with the hypotheses, ERPs revealed distinct coding of social and non-social nogo in the conflict-sensitive N2 which showed a compatibility effect only for social nogo, and in the attention/memory-related P3b which was larger for social relative to non-social nogo. The P3a did not distinguish between social and non-social nogo, but was larger for compatible and smaller for go trials. Contrary to our hypotheses, RTs were faster after social relative to non-social nogo. Hence, the representation of the co-actor’s response in joint action modulates conflict processing reflected in the N2 and response discrimination and evaluation reflected in the P3b and may facilitate subsequent responses in the context of social versus non-social nogo.
AB - This study used a joint flanker task to investigate differences in processing of social and non-social nogo cues, i.e., between cues indicating that a co-actor should respond and cues signaling that neither actor nor co-actor should respond, using event-related potentials (ERPs) and trial-to-trial response times (RTs). It was hypothesized that a social co-actor’s response should be reflected in stronger modulation (slower RTs on subsequent trials; augmented neural responses) for social compared to non-social nogo. RTs and ERPs replicated flanker compatibility effects, with faster responses and increased P3a on compatible trials. In line with the hypotheses, ERPs revealed distinct coding of social and non-social nogo in the conflict-sensitive N2 which showed a compatibility effect only for social nogo, and in the attention/memory-related P3b which was larger for social relative to non-social nogo. The P3a did not distinguish between social and non-social nogo, but was larger for compatible and smaller for go trials. Contrary to our hypotheses, RTs were faster after social relative to non-social nogo. Hence, the representation of the co-actor’s response in joint action modulates conflict processing reflected in the N2 and response discrimination and evaluation reflected in the P3b and may facilitate subsequent responses in the context of social versus non-social nogo.
KW - Performance monitoring
KW - cognitive control
KW - electroencephalography (EEG)
KW - event-related potentials (ERPs)
KW - task sharing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033701778&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033701778&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/17470919.2017.1403374
DO - 10.1080/17470919.2017.1403374
M3 - Article
C2 - 29115181
AN - SCOPUS:85033701778
SN - 1747-0919
VL - 14
SP - 114
EP - 124
JO - Social Neuroscience
JF - Social Neuroscience
IS - 1
ER -