TY - JOUR
T1 - Intraperitoneal chemotherapy after interval debulking surgery for advanced-stage ovarian cancer
T2 - Feasibility and outcomes at a comprehensive cancer center
AU - Mueller, Jennifer J.
AU - Kelly, Amelia
AU - Zhou, Qin
AU - Iasonos, Alexia
AU - Long Roche, Kara
AU - Sonoda, Yukio
AU - O'Cearbhaill, Roisin E.
AU - Zivanovic, Oliver
AU - Chi, Dennis S.
AU - Gardner, Ginger J.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded in part through the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748 .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Objectives Intraperitoneal (IP)-based chemotherapy following primary debulking surgery (PDS), although associated with substantial toxicity, is supported by a strong evidence base. We sought to determine feasibility and outcomes of IP chemotherapy after interval debulking surgery (IDS) among patients deemed ineligible for PDS. Methods We identified all patients with high-grade, stage III/IV ovarian cancer treated at our institution with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by IDS and postoperative chemotherapy from 1/2008–5/2013. IP and intravenous (IV) regimens were defined; demographic and clinical data were analyzed using appropriate statistics. Results Of 128 evaluable patients, 118 (92%) achieved ≤ 1 cm residual disease at IDS and 74 (58%) achieved a complete gross resection (CGR). An IP port was placed in 54/128 patients (42%), with 89% port utilization. Forty-eight (38%) of 128 patients received IP chemotherapy, 17 (13%) weekly IV paclitaxel/q3week carboplatin, and 63 (49%) q3week IV carboplatin/paclitaxel. Patients completed a median of 3 IP cycles (range, 2–6), with 3 (5.5%) of 54 ports removed due to complications. Overall survival (OS) for patients with a CGR treated with IP and weekly IV chemotherapy was 53.2 months (range, 24.7-NE), and 44.2 months (range, 30.2-NE) with any visible residual disease (p < 0.001). Median OS was 53.2 months (range, 44.5-NE) for IP-, not reached for weekly IV-, and 34.2 months (range, 27.5–49.8) for q3week IV-treated patients (p = 0.1). Conclusions Patients administered IP after IDS had a high rate of successful port utilization, with few regimen switches. Oncologic outcomes were optimal in patients with a CGR at IDS, regardless of chemotherapy used.
AB - Objectives Intraperitoneal (IP)-based chemotherapy following primary debulking surgery (PDS), although associated with substantial toxicity, is supported by a strong evidence base. We sought to determine feasibility and outcomes of IP chemotherapy after interval debulking surgery (IDS) among patients deemed ineligible for PDS. Methods We identified all patients with high-grade, stage III/IV ovarian cancer treated at our institution with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by IDS and postoperative chemotherapy from 1/2008–5/2013. IP and intravenous (IV) regimens were defined; demographic and clinical data were analyzed using appropriate statistics. Results Of 128 evaluable patients, 118 (92%) achieved ≤ 1 cm residual disease at IDS and 74 (58%) achieved a complete gross resection (CGR). An IP port was placed in 54/128 patients (42%), with 89% port utilization. Forty-eight (38%) of 128 patients received IP chemotherapy, 17 (13%) weekly IV paclitaxel/q3week carboplatin, and 63 (49%) q3week IV carboplatin/paclitaxel. Patients completed a median of 3 IP cycles (range, 2–6), with 3 (5.5%) of 54 ports removed due to complications. Overall survival (OS) for patients with a CGR treated with IP and weekly IV chemotherapy was 53.2 months (range, 24.7-NE), and 44.2 months (range, 30.2-NE) with any visible residual disease (p < 0.001). Median OS was 53.2 months (range, 44.5-NE) for IP-, not reached for weekly IV-, and 34.2 months (range, 27.5–49.8) for q3week IV-treated patients (p = 0.1). Conclusions Patients administered IP after IDS had a high rate of successful port utilization, with few regimen switches. Oncologic outcomes were optimal in patients with a CGR at IDS, regardless of chemotherapy used.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84997795506&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84997795506&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.09.014
DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.09.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 27692668
AN - SCOPUS:84997795506
SN - 0090-8258
VL - 143
SP - 496
EP - 503
JO - Gynecologic oncology
JF - Gynecologic oncology
IS - 3
ER -