TY - JOUR
T1 - Intersectionality in nursing research
T2 - A scoping review
AU - Sherman, Athena D.F.
AU - Febres-Cordero, Sarah
AU - Bonds Johnson, Kalisha
AU - Clark, Kristen D.
AU - Klepper, Meredith
AU - Duroseau, Brenice
AU - Lin, Yufen
AU - Zhang, Wenhui
AU - Coleman, Mercy
AU - Prakash, Diane
AU - Daniel, Gaea A.
AU - Chand, Arzina Tabassum
AU - Kalu, Ugo
AU - Tarter, Robin
AU - Allgood, Sarah
AU - Cohen, Sydney
AU - Kelly, Ursula
AU - Balthazar, Monique
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Background: An intersectional approach to health research provides an analytical foundation to explain the multidimensionality of health status, resource accessibility, privilege, oppression, and current and historical context. The use of intersectionality in health research has known limitations. Its use in health-related fields too often focuses on outcomes, such as health disparities, rather than processes, such as power structures and social determinants. Objective: This scoping review serves to examine how intersectionality has been implemented by nurses in the peer-reviewed literature. We offer insight into how it may be incorporated to inform future nursing research and healthcare provision. Design & Methods: Systematic searches of PubMed (n = 257), SCOPUS (n = 807), EMBASE (n = 396), CINAHL (n = 224), and Health Source: Nursing and Academics (n = 491), published since the seminal publication on intersectionality (1989 - 2023), identified 131 research articles that met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data extraction and synthesis were used to describe the breadth and depth of the literature specific to the application of intersectionality in nursing research. Results: The included studies used intersectionality to examine the intersections of numerous identities, such as race, gender, and immigration status. However, most studies were descriptive/observational in nature, underreported their methods, and conducted deficit-based research instead of strength-based inquiries. Of note, the vast majority of included articles were published within the last five years. Conclusions: Future researchers using intersectionality as a framework can improve their approach by reporting clear definitions and operationalization of intersectionality. Observational science dominated the included studies; future research should focus on intervention development and evaluation using an intersectional lens. Lastly, caution should be placed on research that focuses solely on deficits among marginalized communities, which places scientists at risk of perpetuating stereotypes or enhancing already-existing stigmas. Tweetable abstract: Scoping review revealed nursing scientists have applied intersectionality in research globally, pointing to its growing role in the advancement of health equity.
AB - Background: An intersectional approach to health research provides an analytical foundation to explain the multidimensionality of health status, resource accessibility, privilege, oppression, and current and historical context. The use of intersectionality in health research has known limitations. Its use in health-related fields too often focuses on outcomes, such as health disparities, rather than processes, such as power structures and social determinants. Objective: This scoping review serves to examine how intersectionality has been implemented by nurses in the peer-reviewed literature. We offer insight into how it may be incorporated to inform future nursing research and healthcare provision. Design & Methods: Systematic searches of PubMed (n = 257), SCOPUS (n = 807), EMBASE (n = 396), CINAHL (n = 224), and Health Source: Nursing and Academics (n = 491), published since the seminal publication on intersectionality (1989 - 2023), identified 131 research articles that met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data extraction and synthesis were used to describe the breadth and depth of the literature specific to the application of intersectionality in nursing research. Results: The included studies used intersectionality to examine the intersections of numerous identities, such as race, gender, and immigration status. However, most studies were descriptive/observational in nature, underreported their methods, and conducted deficit-based research instead of strength-based inquiries. Of note, the vast majority of included articles were published within the last five years. Conclusions: Future researchers using intersectionality as a framework can improve their approach by reporting clear definitions and operationalization of intersectionality. Observational science dominated the included studies; future research should focus on intervention development and evaluation using an intersectional lens. Lastly, caution should be placed on research that focuses solely on deficits among marginalized communities, which places scientists at risk of perpetuating stereotypes or enhancing already-existing stigmas. Tweetable abstract: Scoping review revealed nursing scientists have applied intersectionality in research globally, pointing to its growing role in the advancement of health equity.
KW - Black feminist theory
KW - Health equity
KW - Intersectionality
KW - Oppression
KW - Social justice
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85173249517&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85173249517&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100155
DO - 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100155
M3 - Review article
C2 - 37982092
AN - SCOPUS:85173249517
SN - 2666-142X
VL - 5
JO - International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances
JF - International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances
M1 - 100155
ER -