Abstract
A sample of aflatoxin M1-contaminated lyophilized cow's milk was analyzed by 80 laboratories in 30 countries. Sufficient data were obtained to permit a statistical comparison of the performance of laboratories using AOAC method I and II and those using high performance liquid chromatography for quantitation. A significant difference was noted between means for laboratories using AOAC method I as opposed to those using HPLC methods. Overall reproducibility (between- plus within-laboratory precision) was best for laboratories using HPLC methods and poorest for those using AOAC method II.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 864-868 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists |
| Volume | 65 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| State | Published - Dec 1 1982 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Chemistry
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'International mycotoxin check sample program: Part II. Report on laboratory performance for determination of aflatoxin M1 in milk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS