TY - JOUR
T1 - Instruments for evaluating shared medical decision making
T2 - A structured literature review
AU - Dy, Sydney Morss
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2011 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2007/12
Y1 - 2007/12
N2 - The author conducted a structured literature review of instruments for evaluating shared medical decision making. She included relevant instruments that were generalizable beyond specific situations and had been formally evaluated and organized them by domains of values or preferences, information and communication in decision making, and other aspects of decision making. For values or preferences, the author identified 11 instruments, mostly on preferences for roles and information. For information and communication, she found a systematic review of instruments for observational assessment of decision making, 3 additional observational instruments, and 3 questionnaires. For other aspects of decision making, the author identified 3 instruments in domains such as decision self-efficacy and 4 multidimensional instruments. Although instrument development tended to cluster in several areas and there were clear gaps in the literature, the diversity of instruments demonstrates the broad range of constructs involved in assessing shared decision making.
AB - The author conducted a structured literature review of instruments for evaluating shared medical decision making. She included relevant instruments that were generalizable beyond specific situations and had been formally evaluated and organized them by domains of values or preferences, information and communication in decision making, and other aspects of decision making. For values or preferences, the author identified 11 instruments, mostly on preferences for roles and information. For information and communication, she found a systematic review of instruments for observational assessment of decision making, 3 additional observational instruments, and 3 questionnaires. For other aspects of decision making, the author identified 3 instruments in domains such as decision self-efficacy and 4 multidimensional instruments. Although instrument development tended to cluster in several areas and there were clear gaps in the literature, the diversity of instruments demonstrates the broad range of constructs involved in assessing shared decision making.
KW - Measurement instruments
KW - Preferences
KW - Roles
KW - Satisfaction
KW - Shared decision making
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35949003493&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35949003493&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1077558707305941
DO - 10.1177/1077558707305941
M3 - Review article
C2 - 17804824
AN - SCOPUS:35949003493
SN - 1077-5587
VL - 64
SP - 623
EP - 649
JO - Medical Care Research and Review
JF - Medical Care Research and Review
IS - 6
ER -