Institutional cost comparison between heart transplants and left ventricular assist device implantations

Neeraj Chimanji, Arman Kilic, Ayesha Hasan, Robert S.D. Higgins, Bryan A. Whitson, Ahmet Kilic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations


Objectives: Increased numbers of end-stage heart failure patients and improved technology have led to increased use of left ventricular assist devices as a viable alternative to heart transplants. Given the current economic climate, we compared costs of heart transplant versus device placement. Materials and Methods: Medical records of patients who received heart transplants or left ventricular assist devices were cross-referenced with institutional financial data. The device cohort was limited to those receiving durable (not temporary) devices. Index admission, 1-year readmission, and overall 1-year charges were compared using standard statistical methods. Results: Of 184 identified patients with end-stage heart failure surgical therapy, 121 received left ventricular assist devices, 43 had heart transplants, and 20 received left ventricular assist devices as bridge to heart transplant; these latter patients were excluded from our analyses. At index admission, mean charges were $863 433 ± $398 427 for device patients and $725877 ± $488685 for transplant patients (P =.05). One-year mean readmission rates were similar (4.65/transplant patient and 4.53/device patient; P =.94), with corresponding 1-year survival rates of 87.8% and 78.0% (P =.04). Total readmission charges during year 1 were $169 732 ± $242 366 for device patients and $201 682 ± $297 565 for transplant patients (P =.08), with corresponding overall charges at 1 year of $1 029 732 ± $450 498 and $927 559 ± $562404 (P =.49). Conclusions: During the first year, heart transplant and left ventricular assist device placement have similar costs. Initial index admission costs seem to favor heart transplant, with device pump costs accounting for some of the difference. From a 1-year survival perspective, heart transplant may be more effective; however, with lack of suitable donors, left ventricular assist devices are valuable in the armamentarium of advanced heart failure surgical options.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)656-659
Number of pages4
JournalExperimental and Clinical Transplantation
Issue number6
StatePublished - Dec 2016


  • Heart failure
  • Heart-assist device economics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transplantation


Dive into the research topics of 'Institutional cost comparison between heart transplants and left ventricular assist device implantations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this