TY - JOUR
T1 - Insertion force measurement of cervical traction tongs
T2 - A biomechanical study
AU - Littleton, Kamala
AU - Curcin, Aleksandar
AU - Novak, Vincent P.
AU - Belkoff, Stephen M.
PY - 2000/1/1
Y1 - 2000/1/1
N2 - Objectives: To measure the insertion forces for various cervical traction tong pins and the force required to penetrate cadaveric skull specimens. Design: Cadaveric study testing long pin forces. Methods: Insertion force and pin indicator displacement were measured in three tongs from each of three manufacturers (PMT, Depuy Ace, Gardner-Wells) after tightening pins per the manufacturer's recommendations and beyond. The force required for skull penetration was measured by driving each pin into cadaveric temporal specimens until the specimen failed or was penetrated. Results: Forces generated at the recommended pin settings were: PMT, 141 ± 12 newtons; Ace, 0 ± 0 newtons; Gardner-Wells, 132 ± 9 newtons. The Ace long required 1.0-millimeter indicator protrusion beyond manufacturer's recommended setting before generating clinically significant forces (120 ± 8 newtons). Unlike the PMT and Ace pins, overtightening of the Gardner-Wells pins (by as little as 0.3 mm beyond recommended indicator displacement) resulted in substantially larger pin force (>448 newtons). Average failure loads of the temporal bone specimens were: PMT, 721 ± 298 newtons; Ace, 636 ± 351 newtons; Gardner-Wells, 965 ± 227 newtons. Conclusions: Although pin forces generated at the recommended end point for PMT and Gardner-Wells tongs appear safe, insufficient force was generated for Ace tongs. Furthermore, overtightening of the Gardner-Wells pins generated loads in excess of those that may be required to penetrate the skull.
AB - Objectives: To measure the insertion forces for various cervical traction tong pins and the force required to penetrate cadaveric skull specimens. Design: Cadaveric study testing long pin forces. Methods: Insertion force and pin indicator displacement were measured in three tongs from each of three manufacturers (PMT, Depuy Ace, Gardner-Wells) after tightening pins per the manufacturer's recommendations and beyond. The force required for skull penetration was measured by driving each pin into cadaveric temporal specimens until the specimen failed or was penetrated. Results: Forces generated at the recommended pin settings were: PMT, 141 ± 12 newtons; Ace, 0 ± 0 newtons; Gardner-Wells, 132 ± 9 newtons. The Ace long required 1.0-millimeter indicator protrusion beyond manufacturer's recommended setting before generating clinically significant forces (120 ± 8 newtons). Unlike the PMT and Ace pins, overtightening of the Gardner-Wells pins (by as little as 0.3 mm beyond recommended indicator displacement) resulted in substantially larger pin force (>448 newtons). Average failure loads of the temporal bone specimens were: PMT, 721 ± 298 newtons; Ace, 636 ± 351 newtons; Gardner-Wells, 965 ± 227 newtons. Conclusions: Although pin forces generated at the recommended end point for PMT and Gardner-Wells tongs appear safe, insufficient force was generated for Ace tongs. Furthermore, overtightening of the Gardner-Wells pins generated loads in excess of those that may be required to penetrate the skull.
KW - Cervical tongs
KW - Comparison study
KW - Failure loads
KW - Pin force
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034280992&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034280992&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00005131-200009000-00008
DO - 10.1097/00005131-200009000-00008
M3 - Article
C2 - 11083614
AN - SCOPUS:0034280992
SN - 0890-5339
VL - 14
SP - 505
EP - 508
JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
IS - 7
ER -