TY - JOUR
T1 - Inpatient vs outpatient management and timing of delivery of uncomplicated monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancy
T2 - the MONOMONO study
AU - The MONOMONO Working Group
AU - Saccone, Gabriele
AU - Berghella, Vincenzo
AU - Locci, Mariavittoria
AU - Ghi, Tullio
AU - Frusca, Tiziana
AU - Lanna, Mariano
AU - Faiola, Stefano
AU - Fichera, Anna
AU - Prefumo, Federico
AU - Rizzo, Giuseppe
AU - Bosi, Costanza
AU - Arduino, Bruno
AU - D'Alessandro, Pietro
AU - Borgo, Maria
AU - Arduino, Silvana
AU - Cantanna, Elisabetta
AU - Simonazzi, Giuliana
AU - Rizzo, Nicola
AU - Francesca, Giorgetta
AU - Seravalli, Viola
AU - Miller, Jena L.
AU - Magro-Malosso, Elena Rita
AU - Di Tommaso, Mariarosaria
AU - Dall'Asta, Andrea
AU - Galli, Letizia
AU - Volpe, Nicola
AU - Visentin, Silvia
AU - Cosmi, Erich
AU - Sarno, Laura
AU - Caissutti, Claudia
AU - Driul, Lorenza
AU - Anastasio, Hannah
AU - Di Mascio, Daniele
AU - Panici, Pierluigi Benedetti
AU - Vena, Flaminia
AU - Brunelli, Roberto
AU - Ciardulli, Andrea
AU - D'Antonio, Francesco
AU - Schoen, Corina
AU - Suhag, Anju
AU - Gambacorti-Passerini, Zita Maria
AU - Baz, Maria Angeles Anaya
AU - Magoga, Giulia
AU - Busato, Enrico
AU - Filippi, Elisa
AU - Suárez, María José Rodriguez
AU - Alderete, Francisco Gamez
AU - Ortuno, Paula Alonso
AU - Vitagliano, Amerigo
AU - Baschat, Ahmet A.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Lamberto Manzoli, Full Professor at Local Health Unit, University of Pescara, Pescara, Italy, for providing assistance with the statistical analysis.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2019/2/1
Y1 - 2019/2/1
N2 - Objectives: Monoamniotic twin pregnancies are at increased risk of perinatal complications, primarily owing to the risk of cord entanglement. There is no recommendation on whether such pregnancies should be managed in hospital or can be safely managed in an outpatient setting, and the timing of planned delivery is also a subject of debate. The aim of this study was to compare the perinatal outcomes of inpatient vs outpatient fetal surveillance approaches employed among 22 participating study centers, and to calculate the fetal and neonatal death rates according to gestational age, in non-anomalous monoamniotic twins from 26 weeks' gestation. Methods: The MONOMONO study was a multinational cohort study of consecutive women with monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancies, who were referred to 22 university hospitals in Italy, the USA, the UK and Spain, from January 2010 to January 2017. Only non-anomalous uncomplicated monoamniotic twin pregnancies with two live fetuses at 26 + 0 weeks' gestation were included in the study. In 10 of the centers, monoamniotic twins were managed routinely as inpatients, whereas in the other 12 centers they were managed routinely as outpatients. The primary outcome was intrauterine fetal death. We also planned to assess fetal and neonatal death rates according to gestational age per 1-week interval. Outcomes are presented as odds ratio (OR) with 95% CIs. The main outcome was analyzed using both standard logistic regression analysis, in which each fetus was treated as an independent unit, and a generalized mixed-model approach, with each twin pair treated as a cluster unit, considering that the outcome for a twin is not independent of that of its cotwin. Results: 195 consecutive pregnant women with a non-anomalous uncomplicated monoamniotic twin gestation (390 fetuses) were included. Of these, 75 (38.5%) were managed as inpatients and 120 (61.5%) as outpatients. The overall perinatal loss rate was 10.8% (42/390) with a peak fetal death rate of 4.3% (15/348) occurring at 29 weeks' gestation. There was no significant difference in mean gestational age at delivery (31 weeks), birth weight (∼1.6 kg), or emergency delivery rate between the inpatient and outpatient surveillance groups. Based on generalized mixed-model analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in fetal death rates between inpatient management commencing from around 26 weeks compared with outpatient surveillance protocols from 30 weeks (3.3% vs 10.8%; adjusted OR 0.21 (95% CI, 0.04–1.17)). Maternal length of stay in the hospital was 42.1 days in the inpatient group, and 7.4 days in the outpatient group (mean difference 34.70 days (95% CI, 31.36–38.04 days). From 32 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks, no fetal or neonatal death in either group was recorded. 46 fetuses were delivered after 34 + 0 weeks, and none of them died in utero or within the first 28 days postpartum. Conclusion: In uncomplicated monoamniotic twins, inpatient surveillance is associated with similar fetal mortality as outpatient management. After 31 + 6 weeks, and up to 36 + 6 weeks, there were no intrauterine fetal deaths or neonatal deaths.
AB - Objectives: Monoamniotic twin pregnancies are at increased risk of perinatal complications, primarily owing to the risk of cord entanglement. There is no recommendation on whether such pregnancies should be managed in hospital or can be safely managed in an outpatient setting, and the timing of planned delivery is also a subject of debate. The aim of this study was to compare the perinatal outcomes of inpatient vs outpatient fetal surveillance approaches employed among 22 participating study centers, and to calculate the fetal and neonatal death rates according to gestational age, in non-anomalous monoamniotic twins from 26 weeks' gestation. Methods: The MONOMONO study was a multinational cohort study of consecutive women with monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancies, who were referred to 22 university hospitals in Italy, the USA, the UK and Spain, from January 2010 to January 2017. Only non-anomalous uncomplicated monoamniotic twin pregnancies with two live fetuses at 26 + 0 weeks' gestation were included in the study. In 10 of the centers, monoamniotic twins were managed routinely as inpatients, whereas in the other 12 centers they were managed routinely as outpatients. The primary outcome was intrauterine fetal death. We also planned to assess fetal and neonatal death rates according to gestational age per 1-week interval. Outcomes are presented as odds ratio (OR) with 95% CIs. The main outcome was analyzed using both standard logistic regression analysis, in which each fetus was treated as an independent unit, and a generalized mixed-model approach, with each twin pair treated as a cluster unit, considering that the outcome for a twin is not independent of that of its cotwin. Results: 195 consecutive pregnant women with a non-anomalous uncomplicated monoamniotic twin gestation (390 fetuses) were included. Of these, 75 (38.5%) were managed as inpatients and 120 (61.5%) as outpatients. The overall perinatal loss rate was 10.8% (42/390) with a peak fetal death rate of 4.3% (15/348) occurring at 29 weeks' gestation. There was no significant difference in mean gestational age at delivery (31 weeks), birth weight (∼1.6 kg), or emergency delivery rate between the inpatient and outpatient surveillance groups. Based on generalized mixed-model analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in fetal death rates between inpatient management commencing from around 26 weeks compared with outpatient surveillance protocols from 30 weeks (3.3% vs 10.8%; adjusted OR 0.21 (95% CI, 0.04–1.17)). Maternal length of stay in the hospital was 42.1 days in the inpatient group, and 7.4 days in the outpatient group (mean difference 34.70 days (95% CI, 31.36–38.04 days). From 32 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks, no fetal or neonatal death in either group was recorded. 46 fetuses were delivered after 34 + 0 weeks, and none of them died in utero or within the first 28 days postpartum. Conclusion: In uncomplicated monoamniotic twins, inpatient surveillance is associated with similar fetal mortality as outpatient management. After 31 + 6 weeks, and up to 36 + 6 weeks, there were no intrauterine fetal deaths or neonatal deaths.
KW - Cesarean delivery
KW - chorionicity
KW - cord accident
KW - cord entanglement
KW - healthcare
KW - monochorionic
KW - multiple gestation
KW - perinatal death
KW - respiratory distress syndrome
KW - twin pregnancy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059251766&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059251766&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/uog.19179
DO - 10.1002/uog.19179
M3 - Article
C2 - 30019431
AN - SCOPUS:85059251766
SN - 0960-7692
VL - 53
SP - 175
EP - 183
JO - Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
JF - Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
IS - 2
ER -