TY - JOUR
T1 - Inhibitory potential of autologous neutralizing antibodies sets quantitative limits on the rebound-competent HIV-1 reservoir
AU - Garcia, Mauro A.
AU - Farrell-Sherman, Anna
AU - Aydin, Beril
AU - Zhuo, Junlin
AU - Fray, Emily J.
AU - Zinsser, Anna M.
AU - Lai, Jun
AU - Sowers, Kirsten
AU - Li, Haoyue
AU - Lopez, Brianna M.
AU - Abeyta-Lopez, Anthony
AU - Chu, Tifany
AU - Lubbeck, Donald
AU - Chae, Moonki
AU - Bachmann, Niklas
AU - Varriale, Joseph
AU - Westfall, Dylan H.
AU - Hoh, Rebecca
AU - Dalhuisen, Thomas
AU - Simonetti, Francesco R.
AU - Peluso, Michael J.
AU - Deeks, Steven G.
AU - Siliciano, Robert F.
AU - Cohn, Lillian B.
AU - Siliciano, Janet D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
PY - 2026/7/7
Y1 - 2026/7/7
N2 - HIV-1 cure requires preventing viral rebound after treatment interruption, but quantitative criteria defining the rebound-competent reservoir are lacking. We studied individuals undergoing observational treatment interruption without confounding interventions to identify virologic and immunologic determinants of rebound. In 9 of 13 participants, rebound viruses were genetically identical or similar to proviruses in circulating resting CD4+ T-cells. We found no evidence of recombination among rebound sequences. Instead, resistance to autologous neutralizing antibodies (aNAbs) was a critical determinant of viral rebound. Increased suppression of viral outgrowth by contemporaneous IgG isolated from plasma was correlated with longer time to rebound. Using inhibitory potential (IP), the log reduction in single-round infection at physiologic IgG concentrations, we defined quantitative limits governing rebound-competency with respect to contemporaneous aNAbs. Contemporaneous IgG antibodies inhibited different reservoir variants with a wide range of IP values (0.4 to 8.2 logs), whereas rebound viruses were minimally inhibited (0.5 to 2.8 logs), indicating that inhibition by even up to 2.8 logs (631-fold) cannot prevent rebound. Longitudinal analyses revealed that waning aNAb potency over time on antiretroviral therapy (ART) allows previously neutralized variants to gain rebound potential, consistent with the finding that rebound can come from variants deposited in the reservoir at different pre-ART time points. Thus, rebound competency is a dynamic, immune-governed property defined by quantitative immunologic constraints, including those exerted by aNAbs.
AB - HIV-1 cure requires preventing viral rebound after treatment interruption, but quantitative criteria defining the rebound-competent reservoir are lacking. We studied individuals undergoing observational treatment interruption without confounding interventions to identify virologic and immunologic determinants of rebound. In 9 of 13 participants, rebound viruses were genetically identical or similar to proviruses in circulating resting CD4+ T-cells. We found no evidence of recombination among rebound sequences. Instead, resistance to autologous neutralizing antibodies (aNAbs) was a critical determinant of viral rebound. Increased suppression of viral outgrowth by contemporaneous IgG isolated from plasma was correlated with longer time to rebound. Using inhibitory potential (IP), the log reduction in single-round infection at physiologic IgG concentrations, we defined quantitative limits governing rebound-competency with respect to contemporaneous aNAbs. Contemporaneous IgG antibodies inhibited different reservoir variants with a wide range of IP values (0.4 to 8.2 logs), whereas rebound viruses were minimally inhibited (0.5 to 2.8 logs), indicating that inhibition by even up to 2.8 logs (631-fold) cannot prevent rebound. Longitudinal analyses revealed that waning aNAb potency over time on antiretroviral therapy (ART) allows previously neutralized variants to gain rebound potential, consistent with the finding that rebound can come from variants deposited in the reservoir at different pre-ART time points. Thus, rebound competency is a dynamic, immune-governed property defined by quantitative immunologic constraints, including those exerted by aNAbs.
KW - HIV
KW - analytical treatment interruption
KW - autologous neutralizing antibodies
KW - latent reservoir
KW - viral rebound
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105043814464
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105043814464#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1073/pnas.2608337123
DO - 10.1073/pnas.2608337123
M3 - Article
C2 - 42391404
AN - SCOPUS:105043814464
SN - 0027-8424
VL - 123
JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
IS - 27
M1 - e2608337123
ER -