TY - JOUR
T1 - Inhibition of return in aging and Alzheimer's disease
T2 - Performance as a function of task demands and stimulus timing
AU - Langley, L. K.
AU - Fuentes, L. J.
AU - Hochhalter, A. K.
AU - Brandt, J.
AU - Overmier, J. B.
N1 - Funding Information:
The study was supported in part by Grant PM97-0002 from the Dirección General de EnsenÄanza Superior (D.G.E.S.), Training Grant T32-AG00198 from the National Institute on Aging, and the Center for Cognitive Sciences at the University of Minnesota. We would like to thank David S. Knopman, Margaret M. Prod'Homme, Claudia Kawas, Helen Karagiozis, and Carol Gogel for their assistance in recruiting AD participants. Address correspondence to: Linda K. Langley, Box 2980, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710. Tel.: (919) 660–7537. E-mail: [email protected] Accepted for publication: November 17, 2000.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - Inhibition of return (IOR) is a phenomenon of spatial attention that biases attention toward novel events in the environment. Recent evidence suggests that the magnitude and timing of IOR varies as a function of task conditions (e.g., detection vs. discrimination tasks, short vs. long cue-target intervals, intrinsic vs. extrinsic cues). Although IOR appears relatively preserved with both normal aging and Alzheimer's disease (AD), it has been tested under relatively simple task conditions. To test whether IOR is resistant to age and/ or AD when cognitive demands are increased, we employed a double-cue IOR paradigm that required categorization as well as detection responses. The stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between the cue and target events was varied to determine whether group differences existed in IOR effects over time. Younger normal adults and older normal adults exhibited significant IOR effects on both the detection task and the categorization task at a short cue-target SOA (950 ms). In contrast, AD patients exhibited significant IOR effects at the short SOA on the detection task but not on the categorization task. From the short to the long SOA (3500 ms), IOR effects exhibited by younger normal adults declined significantly during both the detection and the categorization tasks, suggesting that inhibition resolved over time. In contrast, neither older normal adults nor AD patients exhibited SOA-related IOR reductions on the detection task. These results suggest that IOR may show differential age- and AD-related vulnerabilities depending on task conditions and timing characteristics.
AB - Inhibition of return (IOR) is a phenomenon of spatial attention that biases attention toward novel events in the environment. Recent evidence suggests that the magnitude and timing of IOR varies as a function of task conditions (e.g., detection vs. discrimination tasks, short vs. long cue-target intervals, intrinsic vs. extrinsic cues). Although IOR appears relatively preserved with both normal aging and Alzheimer's disease (AD), it has been tested under relatively simple task conditions. To test whether IOR is resistant to age and/ or AD when cognitive demands are increased, we employed a double-cue IOR paradigm that required categorization as well as detection responses. The stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between the cue and target events was varied to determine whether group differences existed in IOR effects over time. Younger normal adults and older normal adults exhibited significant IOR effects on both the detection task and the categorization task at a short cue-target SOA (950 ms). In contrast, AD patients exhibited significant IOR effects at the short SOA on the detection task but not on the categorization task. From the short to the long SOA (3500 ms), IOR effects exhibited by younger normal adults declined significantly during both the detection and the categorization tasks, suggesting that inhibition resolved over time. In contrast, neither older normal adults nor AD patients exhibited SOA-related IOR reductions on the detection task. These results suggest that IOR may show differential age- and AD-related vulnerabilities depending on task conditions and timing characteristics.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034860823&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034860823&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1076/jcen.23.4.431.1235
DO - 10.1076/jcen.23.4.431.1235
M3 - Article
C2 - 11780944
AN - SCOPUS:0034860823
SN - 1380-3395
VL - 23
SP - 431
EP - 446
JO - Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
JF - Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
IS - 4
ER -