Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

InforMing the PAthway of COPD Treatment (IMPACT Trial) Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy (Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/ Vilanterol) Versus Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol and Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Patients with COPD: Analysis of the Western Europe and North America Regions

  • Arnaud Bourdin
  • , Gerard Criner
  • , Gilles Devouassoux
  • , Mark Dransfield
  • , David M.G. Halpin
  • , Mei Lan K. Han
  • , C. Elaine Jones
  • , Ravi Kalhan
  • , Peter Lange
  • , Sally Lettis
  • , David A. Lipson
  • , David A. Lomas
  • , José M. Echave-Sustaeta María-Tomé
  • , Neil Martin
  • , Fernando J. Martinez
  • , Holly Quasny
  • , Lynda Sail
  • , Thomas M. Siler
  • , Dave Singh
  • , Byron Thomashow
  • Henrik Watz, Robert Wise, Nicola A. Hanania

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: The InforMing the Pathway of COPD Treatment (IMPACT) trial demonstrated lower moderate/ severe exacerbation rates with fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) versus FF/VI or UMEC/VI in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and a history of exacerbations. Since IMPACT was a global study, post-hoc analyses were conducted by geographic region to investigate potential differences in overall findings. Methods: IMPACT was a 52-week, randomized, double-blind trial. Patients with symptomatic COPD and ≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the prior year were randomized 2:2:1 to once-daily FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25µg, FF/VI 100/25µg, or UMEC/VI 62.5/25µg. Endpoints assessed in the overall, Western Europe and North America populations included on-treatment moderate/severe exacerbation (rates and time-to-first), trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second and St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score. Safety was assessed. Results: Overall, 10,355 patients were enrolled, 3164 from Western Europe, 2639 from North America. FF/ UMEC/VI significantly reduced on-treatment moderate/severe exacerbation rates versus FF/VI and UMEC/ VI in Western Europe (rate ratios 0.82 [95% CI 0.74-0.91], P<.001 and 0.76 [0.67-0.87], P<.001) and in North America (0.87 [0.77-0.97], P=.014 and 0.69 [0.60-0.80], P<.001). FF/UMEC/VI reduced time-to-first moderate/ severe exacerbation and improved lung function versus FF/VI and UMEC/VI in both regions, and improved SGRQ total score in Western Europe, but not North America. Safety profiles were generally similar between treatment groups/regions; the inhaled corticosteroid class effect of increased pneumonia incidence was seen in North America but not Western Europe. Conclusions: Consistent with intent-to-treat results, FF/UMEC/VI reduced moderate/severe exacerbation rate and risk and improved lung function in Western Europe and North America; however, between-regions differences were seen for SGRQ total score and pneumonia incidence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)76-90
Number of pages15
JournalChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Keywords

  • COPD
  • Exacerbations
  • North America
  • Single-inhaler triple therapy
  • Western Europe

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'InforMing the PAthway of COPD Treatment (IMPACT Trial) Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy (Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/ Vilanterol) Versus Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol and Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Patients with COPD: Analysis of the Western Europe and North America Regions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this