Abstract
This article discusses the history of institutional review boards and the change from a focus on protection of subjects from harm from research to a concern for equitable access to research protocols and potential benefits from participating in a study. The concern about an overemphasis on potential benefits to the detriment of individual subjects is discussed. Finally, the distinction between protection of individuals as it is separate from communities, issues that are raised about obtaining informed consent in communities, as well as the need for trust among researchers, individuals, and communities is examined.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 918-920 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Journal of Nutrition |
| Volume | 135 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 2005 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Benefits
- Informed consent
- Risks
- Vulnerable populations
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Medicine (miscellaneous)
- Nutrition and Dietetics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Informed consent in the context of communities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS