TY - JOUR
T1 - Influences on Primary Care Provider Imaging for a Hypothetical Patient with Low Back Pain
AU - Le, Hai H.
AU - Decamp, Matthew
AU - Bertram, Amanda
AU - Kale, Minal
AU - Berger, Zackary
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
PY - 2018/12/1
Y1 - 2018/12/1
N2 - Objective How outside factors affect physician decision making remains an open question of vital importance. We sought to investigate the importance of various influences on physician decision making when clinical guidelines differ from patient preference. Methods An online survey asking 469 primary care providers (PCPs) across four practice sites whether they would order magnetic resonance imaging for a patient with uncomplicated back pain. Participants were randomized to one of four scenarios: a patient's preference for imaging (control), a patient's preference plus a colleague's opinion against imaging (colleague), a patient's preference plus a professional society's recommendation against imaging (profession), or a patient's preference plus an accountable care organization's quality metric that measures physician use of imaging (ACO). Demographic information and the reasoning behind participants' decisions also were obtained. Results A total of 168 PCPs completed the survey, yielding a 36% completion rate. A majority chose not to pursue imaging: control 68%, colleague 85%, profession 87%, and ACO 78%. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that participants were more likely not to order advanced imaging only when reminded of a professional society recommendation (P = 0.017). Regression also suggested that practice site exerted an effect on the primary outcome. Evidence-based medicine and clinical judgment were the most cited reasons for the decision. Conclusions Our results reinforce the potential to leverage professional societies to advance evidence-based medicine and reduce unnecessary testing. At the same time, practice site appeared to exert influence, suggesting that these recommendations must be part of local institutional culture to be effective.
AB - Objective How outside factors affect physician decision making remains an open question of vital importance. We sought to investigate the importance of various influences on physician decision making when clinical guidelines differ from patient preference. Methods An online survey asking 469 primary care providers (PCPs) across four practice sites whether they would order magnetic resonance imaging for a patient with uncomplicated back pain. Participants were randomized to one of four scenarios: a patient's preference for imaging (control), a patient's preference plus a colleague's opinion against imaging (colleague), a patient's preference plus a professional society's recommendation against imaging (profession), or a patient's preference plus an accountable care organization's quality metric that measures physician use of imaging (ACO). Demographic information and the reasoning behind participants' decisions also were obtained. Results A total of 168 PCPs completed the survey, yielding a 36% completion rate. A majority chose not to pursue imaging: control 68%, colleague 85%, profession 87%, and ACO 78%. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that participants were more likely not to order advanced imaging only when reminded of a professional society recommendation (P = 0.017). Regression also suggested that practice site exerted an effect on the primary outcome. Evidence-based medicine and clinical judgment were the most cited reasons for the decision. Conclusions Our results reinforce the potential to leverage professional societies to advance evidence-based medicine and reduce unnecessary testing. At the same time, practice site appeared to exert influence, suggesting that these recommendations must be part of local institutional culture to be effective.
KW - back pain
KW - imaging
KW - professional society
KW - shared decision making
KW - standard of care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057759949&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057759949&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000901
DO - 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000901
M3 - Article
C2 - 30512130
AN - SCOPUS:85057759949
SN - 0038-4348
VL - 111
SP - 758
EP - 762
JO - Southern medical journal
JF - Southern medical journal
IS - 12
ER -