TY - JOUR
T1 - Independent validation of candidate breast cancer serum biomarkers identified by mass spectrometry
AU - Li, Jinong
AU - Orlandi, Rosaria
AU - White, C. Nicole
AU - Rosenzweig, Jason
AU - Zhao, Jing
AU - Seregni, Ettore
AU - Morelli, Daniele
AU - Yu, Yinhua
AU - Meng, Xiao Ying
AU - Zhang, Zhen
AU - Davidson, Nancy E.
AU - Fung, Eric T.
AU - Chan, Daniel W.
PY - 2005/12
Y1 - 2005/12
N2 - Background: We previously selected a panel of 3 breast cancer biomarkers (BC1, BC2, and BC3) from serum samples collected at a single hospital based on their collective contribution to the optimal separation of breast cancer patients and noncancer controls by surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF MS). The identities and general applicability of these markers, however, were unknown. In this study, we performed protein expression profiling on samples obtained from a second hospital, included a greater number of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) cases, and performed purification and identification of the 2 confirmed markers. Methods: Using a case-control study design, we performed protein expression profiling on serum samples from the National Cancer Institute (Milan, Italy). The validation sample cohort consisted of 61 women with locally invasive breast cancer, 32 with DCIS, 37 with various benign breast diseases (including 13 atypical), and 46 age-matched apparently healthy women (age range, 44-68 years). Validated biomarkers were purified and identified with serial chromatography, 1-dimensional gel electrophoresis, in-gel ASP-N digestion, peptide mass fingerprinting, and tandem mass peptide sequencing. Results: The BC3 and BC2 expression patterns in this sample set were consistent with the first study sample set. BC3 and BC2 were identified to be complement component C3a desArg and a C-terminal-truncated form of C3adesArg, respectively. Conclusions: Evaluation of biomarkers in independent sample sets can help determine the broader utility of candidate markers, and protein identification permits understanding of their molecular basis. C3a desArg appears to lack specificity among patients with benign diseases, limiting its utility as a stand-alone tumor marker, but it may still be useful in a multimarker panel for early detection of breast cancer.
AB - Background: We previously selected a panel of 3 breast cancer biomarkers (BC1, BC2, and BC3) from serum samples collected at a single hospital based on their collective contribution to the optimal separation of breast cancer patients and noncancer controls by surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF MS). The identities and general applicability of these markers, however, were unknown. In this study, we performed protein expression profiling on samples obtained from a second hospital, included a greater number of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) cases, and performed purification and identification of the 2 confirmed markers. Methods: Using a case-control study design, we performed protein expression profiling on serum samples from the National Cancer Institute (Milan, Italy). The validation sample cohort consisted of 61 women with locally invasive breast cancer, 32 with DCIS, 37 with various benign breast diseases (including 13 atypical), and 46 age-matched apparently healthy women (age range, 44-68 years). Validated biomarkers were purified and identified with serial chromatography, 1-dimensional gel electrophoresis, in-gel ASP-N digestion, peptide mass fingerprinting, and tandem mass peptide sequencing. Results: The BC3 and BC2 expression patterns in this sample set were consistent with the first study sample set. BC3 and BC2 were identified to be complement component C3a desArg and a C-terminal-truncated form of C3adesArg, respectively. Conclusions: Evaluation of biomarkers in independent sample sets can help determine the broader utility of candidate markers, and protein identification permits understanding of their molecular basis. C3a desArg appears to lack specificity among patients with benign diseases, limiting its utility as a stand-alone tumor marker, but it may still be useful in a multimarker panel for early detection of breast cancer.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=28044471999&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=28044471999&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1373/clinchem.2005.052878
DO - 10.1373/clinchem.2005.052878
M3 - Article
C2 - 16223889
AN - SCOPUS:28044471999
SN - 0009-9147
VL - 51
SP - 2229
EP - 2235
JO - Clinical chemistry
JF - Clinical chemistry
IS - 12
ER -