TY - JOUR
T1 - In-Home Secondhand Smoke Exposure among Urban Children with Asthma
T2 - Contrasting Households with and Without Residential Smokers
AU - Wu, Tianshi David
AU - Eakin, Michelle N.
AU - Rand, Cynthia S.
AU - Brigham, Emily P.
AU - Diette, Gregory B.
AU - Hansel, Nadia N.
AU - McCormack, Meredith C.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by grants from the National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (grant number F32ES028578 to TDW, P50ES018176 to NNH, and P01ES018176, P50ES015903, and K24ES021098 to GBD); the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the NIH (grant number KL2TR001077 to EPB); and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (agreement numbers 83615201 and 83451001 to NNH).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/3/1
Y1 - 2019/3/1
N2 - Context: Secondhand smoke exposure (SHSe) affects up to half of all children in the United States. Many studies have identified factors associated with in-home SHSe, but few have contrasted these factors between households with and without residential smokers. In the latter case, exposure occurs from only external sources that enter the home, such as visitors or environmental incursion. Objective: Among children with SHSe at home, to examine demographic and psychosocial differences between households with and without residential smokers. Design: Baseline analysis of an observational cohort. Setting: Baltimore City, Maryland. Participants: A total of 157 children with asthma, aged 5 to 12 years. Measures: At-home airborne nicotine, caregiver-reported depression, asthma-related quality of life, functional social support, and demographics. Univariable comparisons were performed between SHS-exposed households with and without residential smokers. Multivariable logistic regression models were fit to examine associations between measured factors and absence of residential smokers. Results: Children (78.3%) had at-home SHSe. Of these, 40.7% lived in households without residential smokers. Compared with households with residential smokers, these caregivers endorsed stronger beliefs in SHS harms and also worse functional social support and asthma-related stress, despite no differences in asthma morbidity. In adjusted models, SHS-exposed children with caregivers in the lowest tertile of functional social support (adjusted odds ratio, 3.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-10.99), asthma-related quality of life (2.90; 1.06-7.95), and those living alone (5.28; 1.26-22.15) had at least twice higher odds of having exclusively external SHSe than the highest tertile (P trends <.05). Conclusions: In-home SHS exposure remains alarmingly high in urban environments. However, a substantial proportion of this exposure appears to be occurring only from external sources that enter the home. Caregivers in these homes had higher desire but lower agency to avoid SHSe, driven by lack of functional support and physical isolation. Public policies targeting these factors may help remediate exposure in this especially vulnerable population.
AB - Context: Secondhand smoke exposure (SHSe) affects up to half of all children in the United States. Many studies have identified factors associated with in-home SHSe, but few have contrasted these factors between households with and without residential smokers. In the latter case, exposure occurs from only external sources that enter the home, such as visitors or environmental incursion. Objective: Among children with SHSe at home, to examine demographic and psychosocial differences between households with and without residential smokers. Design: Baseline analysis of an observational cohort. Setting: Baltimore City, Maryland. Participants: A total of 157 children with asthma, aged 5 to 12 years. Measures: At-home airborne nicotine, caregiver-reported depression, asthma-related quality of life, functional social support, and demographics. Univariable comparisons were performed between SHS-exposed households with and without residential smokers. Multivariable logistic regression models were fit to examine associations between measured factors and absence of residential smokers. Results: Children (78.3%) had at-home SHSe. Of these, 40.7% lived in households without residential smokers. Compared with households with residential smokers, these caregivers endorsed stronger beliefs in SHS harms and also worse functional social support and asthma-related stress, despite no differences in asthma morbidity. In adjusted models, SHS-exposed children with caregivers in the lowest tertile of functional social support (adjusted odds ratio, 3.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-10.99), asthma-related quality of life (2.90; 1.06-7.95), and those living alone (5.28; 1.26-22.15) had at least twice higher odds of having exclusively external SHSe than the highest tertile (P trends <.05). Conclusions: In-home SHS exposure remains alarmingly high in urban environments. However, a substantial proportion of this exposure appears to be occurring only from external sources that enter the home. Caregivers in these homes had higher desire but lower agency to avoid SHSe, driven by lack of functional support and physical isolation. Public policies targeting these factors may help remediate exposure in this especially vulnerable population.
KW - asthma
KW - epidemiology
KW - health behavior
KW - secondhand smoke exposure
KW - smoking bans
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060983411&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060983411&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000790
DO - 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000790
M3 - Article
C2 - 29883368
AN - SCOPUS:85060983411
SN - 1078-4659
VL - 25
SP - E7-E16
JO - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
JF - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
IS - 2
ER -