TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving use of targeted temperature management after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
T2 - A stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial
AU - Morrison, Laurie J.
AU - Brooks, Steven C.
AU - Dainty, Katie N.
AU - Dorian, Paul
AU - Needham, Dale M.
AU - Ferguson, Niall D.
AU - Rubenfeld, Gordon D.
AU - Slutsky, Arthur S.
AU - Wax, Randy S.
AU - Zwarenstein, Merrick
AU - Thorpe, Kevin
AU - Zhan, Cathy
AU - Scales, Damon C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
PY - 2015/5/20
Y1 - 2015/5/20
N2 - Rationale: International guidelines recommend use of targeted temperature management following resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. This treatment, however, is often neglected or delayed. Objective: To determine whether multifaceted quality improvement interventions would increase the proportion of eligible patients receiving successful targeted temperature management. Setting: A network of 6 regional emergency medical services systems and 32 academic and community hospitals serving a population of 8.8 million people providing post arrest care to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Interventions: Comparing interventions improve the implementation of targeted temperature management post out-of-hospital cardiac arrest through passive (education, generic protocol, order set, local champions) versus additional active quality improvement interventions (nurse specialist providing site-specific interventions, monthly audit-feedback, network educational events, internet blog) versus no intervention (baseline standard of care). Measurements and Main Results The primary process outcome was proportion of eligible patients receiving successful targeted temperature management, defined as a target temperature of 32-34°C within 6 hours of emergency department arrival. Secondary clinical outcomes included survival and neurological outcome at hospital discharge. Four thousand three hundred seventeen out-of-hospital cardiac arrests were transported to hospital; 1,737 (40%) achieved spontaneous circulation, and 934 (22%) were eligible for targeted temperature management. After accounting for secular trends, patients admitted during the passive quality improvement phase were more likely to achieve successful targeted temperature management compared with those admitted during the baseline period (25.7% passive vs 9.0% baseline; odds ratio, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.76-4.32; p < 0.001). Active quality improvement interventions conferred no additional improvements in rates of successful targeted temperature management (26.9% active vs 25.7% passive; odds ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.63-1.45; p = 0.84). Despite a significant increase in rates of successful targeted temperature management, survival to hospital discharge was unchanged. Conclusion: Simple quality improvement interventions significantly increased the rates of achieving successful targeted temperature management following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a large network of hospitals but did not improve clinical outcomes.
AB - Rationale: International guidelines recommend use of targeted temperature management following resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. This treatment, however, is often neglected or delayed. Objective: To determine whether multifaceted quality improvement interventions would increase the proportion of eligible patients receiving successful targeted temperature management. Setting: A network of 6 regional emergency medical services systems and 32 academic and community hospitals serving a population of 8.8 million people providing post arrest care to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Interventions: Comparing interventions improve the implementation of targeted temperature management post out-of-hospital cardiac arrest through passive (education, generic protocol, order set, local champions) versus additional active quality improvement interventions (nurse specialist providing site-specific interventions, monthly audit-feedback, network educational events, internet blog) versus no intervention (baseline standard of care). Measurements and Main Results The primary process outcome was proportion of eligible patients receiving successful targeted temperature management, defined as a target temperature of 32-34°C within 6 hours of emergency department arrival. Secondary clinical outcomes included survival and neurological outcome at hospital discharge. Four thousand three hundred seventeen out-of-hospital cardiac arrests were transported to hospital; 1,737 (40%) achieved spontaneous circulation, and 934 (22%) were eligible for targeted temperature management. After accounting for secular trends, patients admitted during the passive quality improvement phase were more likely to achieve successful targeted temperature management compared with those admitted during the baseline period (25.7% passive vs 9.0% baseline; odds ratio, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.76-4.32; p < 0.001). Active quality improvement interventions conferred no additional improvements in rates of successful targeted temperature management (26.9% active vs 25.7% passive; odds ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.63-1.45; p = 0.84). Despite a significant increase in rates of successful targeted temperature management, survival to hospital discharge was unchanged. Conclusion: Simple quality improvement interventions significantly increased the rates of achieving successful targeted temperature management following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a large network of hospitals but did not improve clinical outcomes.
KW - cluster randomized trial
KW - critical care
KW - emergency medicine
KW - knowledge translation
KW - out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
KW - quality improvement
KW - targeted temperature management
KW - therapeutic hypothermia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84932148852&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84932148852&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000864
DO - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000864
M3 - Article
C2 - 25654175
AN - SCOPUS:84932148852
SN - 0090-3493
VL - 43
SP - 954
EP - 964
JO - Critical care medicine
JF - Critical care medicine
IS - 5
ER -