Abstract
The estimated probability of progressing from phase 3 analgesic clinical trials to regulatory approval is approximately 57%, suggesting that a considerable number of treatments with phase 2 trial results deemed sufficiently successful to progress to phase 3 do not yield positive phase 3 results. Deficiencies in the quality of clinical trial conduct could account for some of this failure. An Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials meeting was convened to identify potential areas for improvement in trial conduct in order to improve assay sensitivity (ie, ability of trials to detect a true treatment effect). We present recommendations based on presentations and discussions at the meeting, literature reviews, and iterative revisions of this article. The recommendations relate to the following areas: 1) study design (ie, to promote feasibility), 2) site selection and staff training, 3) participant selection and training, 4) treatment adherence, 5) data collection, and 6) data and study monitoring. Implementation of these recommendations may improve the quality of clinical trial data and thus the validity and assay sensitivity of clinical trials. Future research regarding the effects of these strategies will help identify the most efficient use of resources for conducting high quality clinical trials. Perspective: Every effort should be made to optimize the quality of clinical trial data. This manuscript discusses considerations to improve conduct of pain clinical trials based on research in multiple medical fields and the expert consensus of pain researchers and stakeholders from academia, regulatory agencies, and industry.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 931-942 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Journal of Pain |
Volume | 21 |
Issue number | 9-10 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 1 2020 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Data quality
- Initiative on Methods
- Measurement
- and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials
- clinical trial conduct
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Neurology
- Clinical Neurology
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Access to Document
Other files and links
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Improving Study Conduct and Data Quality in Clinical Trials of Chronic Pain Treatments: IMMPACT Recommendations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS
In: Journal of Pain, Vol. 21, No. 9-10, 01.09.2020, p. 931-942.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving Study Conduct and Data Quality in Clinical Trials of Chronic Pain Treatments
T2 - IMMPACT Recommendations
AU - Gewandter, Jennifer S.
AU - Dworkin, Robert H.
AU - Turk, Dennis C.
AU - Devine, Eric G.
AU - Hewitt, David
AU - Jensen, Mark P.
AU - Katz, Nathaniel P.
AU - Kirkwood, Amy A.
AU - Malamut, Richard
AU - Markman, John D.
AU - Vrijens, Bernard
AU - Burke, Laurie
AU - Campbell, James N.
AU - Carr, Daniel B.
AU - Conaghan, Philip G.
AU - Cowan, Penney
AU - Doyle, Mittie K.
AU - Edwards, Robert R.
AU - Evans, Scott R.
AU - Farrar, John T.
AU - Freeman, Roy
AU - Gilron, Ian
AU - Juge, Dean
AU - Kerns, Robert D.
AU - Kopecky, Ernest A.
AU - McDermott, Michael P.
AU - Niebler, Gwendolyn
AU - Patel, Kushang V.
AU - Rauck, Richard
AU - Rice, Andrew S.C.
AU - Rowbotham, Michael
AU - Sessler, Nelson E.
AU - Simon, Lee S.
AU - Singla, Neil
AU - Skljarevski, Vladimir
AU - Tockarshewsky, Tina
AU - Vanhove, Geertrui F.
AU - Wasan, Ajay D.
AU - Witter, James
N1 - Funding Information: Philip Conaghan has done consultancies or speakers bureaus for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Flexion Therapeutics, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Kolon TissueGene, Medivir, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samumed and Stryker. P. Conaghan is supported in part by the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leeds Biomedical Research Centre. Funding Information: This article was reviewed and approved by the Executive Committee of the Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks (ACTTION) public-private partnership with the United States Food and Drug Administration. Financial support for this project was provided by the ACTTION public-private partnership which has received unrestricted research contracts, grants, or other revenue from the FDA, multiple pharmaceutical and device companies, philanthropy, and other sources. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. Funding Information: Mark P. Jensen has received in the past 36 months research grants from the National Institutes of Health, the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, The International Association for the Study of Pain, and the Washington State Spinal Injury Consortium. He has also received compensation for consultation from Goalistics. Funding Information: Eric Devine has grant and contract funding from NIAAA and NIDA as part of his salary support at Boston University. This includes reimbursed travel expenses to attend study kick-off meetings. Dr. Devine has received travel reimbursement from NIDA to participate as a speaker at an international conference. He has also received travel reimbursement from NIAAA to serve on a grant review committee. Dr. Devine has received teaching stipends from Adcare Educational Institute for conducting workshops on motivational interviewing and substance use treatment. He does not have individual investments, stocks, intellectual property in any healthcare-related industries. Funding Information: In the past 5 years, Daniel Carr has received consulting fees from 1 startup company (no longer in business), for advice on potential acquisitions of nonopioid analgesics. To his knowledge, none were subsequently marketed. He has been an officer and member of professional associations that accept contributions from the pharmaceutical and medical device industries and use these and other revenues such as membership dues to cover officers? expenses connected with their operations (eg, attending board or planning meetings). Dr Carr does not have investments, stock options or other holdings in such contributors. Other than ACTTION, these associations are the American Academy of Pain Medicine; the American Society of Anesthesiologists; the European Pain Federation; and the International Association for the Study of Pain (as a participant or representative at meetings or hearings). As a member of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Interagency Pain Research Coordinating Committee/National Pain Strategy, he has received travel expenses from NIH to attend their meetings. Additionally, he has received or anticipates potentially receiving personal payments (including travel expenses) for occasional participation as an expert witness; service on an NIH-sponsored data safety monitoring board for a clinical trial; participation in a workshop convened by the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine; and consultant fees from the Federal Trade Commission. He has received modest honoraria for participation in accredited medical education activities.Eric Devine has grant and contract funding from NIAAA and NIDA as part of his salary support at Boston University. This includes reimbursed travel expenses to attend study kick-off meetings. Dr. Devine has received travel reimbursement from NIDA to participate as a speaker at an international conference. He has also received travel reimbursement from NIAAA to serve on a grant review committee. Dr. Devine has received teaching stipends from Adcare Educational Institute for conducting workshops on motivational interviewing and substance use treatment. He does not have individual investments, stocks, intellectual property in any healthcare-related industries.Robert H. Dworkin has received in the past 36 months research grants and contracts from US Food and Drug Administration and US National Institutes of Health, and compensation for consulting on clinical trial methods from Abide, Adynxx, Analgesic Solutions, Aptinyx, Asahi Kasei, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Biohaven, Boston Scientific, Braeburn, Celgene, Centrexion, Chromocell, Clexio, Concert, Dong-A, Eli Lilly, Eupraxia, Glenmark, Grace, Hope, Immune, Neumentum, NeuroBo, Novaremed, Novartis, Pfizer, Phosphagenics, Quark, Reckitt Benckiser, Regenacy, Relmada, Sandoz, Scilex, Semnur, Sollis, Teva, Theranexus, Trevena, and Vertex.Ian Gilron has received support from Biogen, Adynxx, TARIS Biomedical, Astra-Zeneca, Pfizer, and Johnson & Johnson and has received grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Physicians? Services Incorporated Foundation, and Queen's University. Financial Disclosure: The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and no official endorsement by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or the pharmaceutical and device companies that provided unrestricted grants to support the activities of the ACTTION public-private partnership should be inferred. Disclosures by individual authors are as follows: John T. Farrar, in the past 36 months has received: research grants and contracts from US Food and Drug Administration and US National Institutes of Health; compensation for consulting on clinical trial methods from Analgesic Solutions, Aptinyx, Biogen, Campbell Alliance, Daiichi Sankyo, DepoMed, Evadera, Jansen, Lilly, Novartis, and Pfizer; DSMB services from NIH-NIA and Cara Therapeutics; and services as associate editor from Wiley. Mark P. Jensen has received in the past 36 months research grants from the National Institutes of Health, the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, The International Association for the Study of Pain, and the Washington State Spinal Injury Consortium. He has also received compensation for consultation from Goalistics. Robert Kerns has received research funding from NIH, PCORI, Department of Veterans Affairs, Consortium of MS Centers and Honoraria from the American Academy of Pain Medicine (editorial board of Pain Medicine), American Pain Society (reviewer for APS-Pfizer grant program), American Care Management Association (Speaker), American College of Physicians (Speaker), Health Education Resource Organization (Speaker), and Duke University School of Medicine (Speaker). Amy A Kirkwood is funded by Cancer Research UK. Michael P. McDermott has been supported in the past 36 months by research grants from NIH, FDA, NYSTEM, SMA Foundation, Cure SMA, and PTC Therapeutics. He has received compensation for consulting from Neuropore Therapies, Inc and Voyager Therapeutics. He has served on Data and Safety Monitoring Boards (DSMBs) for NIH, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Company, aTyr Pharma, Inc, Catabasis Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Vaccinex, Inc, Cynapsus Therapeutics, and Voyager Therapeutics. Kushang Patel has received in the past 36 months research grants and contracts from US Food and Drug Administration and US National Institutes of Health. Ajay D. Wasan has received in the past 36 months research grants and contracts from US National Institutes of Health, the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, and Collegium Pharmaceuticals. He has received compensation for consulting from Pfizer and Analgesic Solutions. Publisher Copyright: © 2020
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - The estimated probability of progressing from phase 3 analgesic clinical trials to regulatory approval is approximately 57%, suggesting that a considerable number of treatments with phase 2 trial results deemed sufficiently successful to progress to phase 3 do not yield positive phase 3 results. Deficiencies in the quality of clinical trial conduct could account for some of this failure. An Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials meeting was convened to identify potential areas for improvement in trial conduct in order to improve assay sensitivity (ie, ability of trials to detect a true treatment effect). We present recommendations based on presentations and discussions at the meeting, literature reviews, and iterative revisions of this article. The recommendations relate to the following areas: 1) study design (ie, to promote feasibility), 2) site selection and staff training, 3) participant selection and training, 4) treatment adherence, 5) data collection, and 6) data and study monitoring. Implementation of these recommendations may improve the quality of clinical trial data and thus the validity and assay sensitivity of clinical trials. Future research regarding the effects of these strategies will help identify the most efficient use of resources for conducting high quality clinical trials. Perspective: Every effort should be made to optimize the quality of clinical trial data. This manuscript discusses considerations to improve conduct of pain clinical trials based on research in multiple medical fields and the expert consensus of pain researchers and stakeholders from academia, regulatory agencies, and industry.
AB - The estimated probability of progressing from phase 3 analgesic clinical trials to regulatory approval is approximately 57%, suggesting that a considerable number of treatments with phase 2 trial results deemed sufficiently successful to progress to phase 3 do not yield positive phase 3 results. Deficiencies in the quality of clinical trial conduct could account for some of this failure. An Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials meeting was convened to identify potential areas for improvement in trial conduct in order to improve assay sensitivity (ie, ability of trials to detect a true treatment effect). We present recommendations based on presentations and discussions at the meeting, literature reviews, and iterative revisions of this article. The recommendations relate to the following areas: 1) study design (ie, to promote feasibility), 2) site selection and staff training, 3) participant selection and training, 4) treatment adherence, 5) data collection, and 6) data and study monitoring. Implementation of these recommendations may improve the quality of clinical trial data and thus the validity and assay sensitivity of clinical trials. Future research regarding the effects of these strategies will help identify the most efficient use of resources for conducting high quality clinical trials. Perspective: Every effort should be made to optimize the quality of clinical trial data. This manuscript discusses considerations to improve conduct of pain clinical trials based on research in multiple medical fields and the expert consensus of pain researchers and stakeholders from academia, regulatory agencies, and industry.
KW - Data quality
KW - Initiative on Methods
KW - Measurement
KW - and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials
KW - clinical trial conduct
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086389626&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85086389626&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.12.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.12.003
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31843583
AN - SCOPUS:85086389626
SN - 1526-5900
VL - 21
SP - 931
EP - 942
JO - Journal of Pain
JF - Journal of Pain
IS - 9-10
ER -