TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving safety among pregnant women reporting domestic violence in Nepal— A pilot study
AU - the ADVANCE Study Group
AU - Rishal, Poonam
AU - Pun, Kunta Devi
AU - Schei, Berit
AU - Bhandari, Buna
AU - Joshi, Sunil Kumar
AU - Swahnberg, Katarina
AU - Infanti, Jennifer Jean
AU - Lukasse, Mirjam
AU - Bjørngaard, Johan Håkon
AU - Darj, Elisabeth
AU - Lund, Ragnhild
AU - Koju, Rajendra
AU - Wijewardene, Kumudu
AU - Perera, Dinusha Chamanie
AU - Muzrif, Mohamed Munas Mohamed
AU - Campbell, Jacquelyn C.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: This project was funded by the Research Council of Norway under its Global Health and Vaccination Research (GLOBVAC) program, project number 220893: “Evaluating interventions in antenatal care to identify and assist victims of gender-based violence in Nepal and Sri Lanka.” The Liaison Committee for Education, Research and Innovation in Central Norway (Samarbeidsorganet) has also supported the research, grant number 16/29034. The funding body had no role in the design of the study, the collection of data, analysis and interpretation of the data, and in the writing of the manuscript.
Funding Information:
This project was funded by the Research Council of Norway under its Global Health and Vaccination Research (GLOBVAC) program, project number 220893: ?Evaluating interventions in antenatal care to identify and assist victims of gender-based violence in Nepal and Sri Lanka.? The Liaison Committee for Education, Research and Innovation in Central Norway (Samarbeidsorganet) has also supported the research, grant number 16/29034. The funding body had no role in the design of the study, the collection of data, analysis and interpretation of the data, and in the writing of the manuscript. Acknowledgments: The authors are grateful to the funders of this study and the research participants. We are grateful to the principal and gynecology and obstetrics department at Kathmandu Medical College and Teaching Hospital and the C-ACASI team of Prabin Shakya, Shrinkhala Shrestha and Pramita Shrestha for helping us develop the software for the study questionnaire. We thank the visual artist Ms. Rashmi Amatya for the interpretation of the safety measures and drawings to illustrate them in the flipchart.The ADVANCE study team includes the following research partners: Berit Schei (Principal Investigator), Johan H?kon Bj?rngaard, Elisabeth Darj, Jennifer J. Infanti, Mirjam Lukasse, Ragnhild Lund (from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway); Sunil Kumar Joshi, Poonam Rishal (Kathmandu Medical College and Teaching Hospital (KMC], Nepal); Rajendra Koju, Kunta Devi Pun (Dhulikhel Hospital and Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Nepal); Kumudu Wijewardene, Dinusha Chamanie Perera, Mohamed Munas Mohamed Muzrif (University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Sri Lanka); Katarina Swahnberg (Linn?us University Kalmar, Sweden); and Jacquelyn C. Campbell (Johns Hopkins University, USA). Website: http://www.ntnu.edu/web/advance/home.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2020/4/1
Y1 - 2020/4/1
N2 - Introduction: Domestic violence (DV) during pregnancy is associated with poor health outcomes for both the mother and newborn, and sometimes death. In a low-income country like Nepal, women have few options to leave abusive situations. Therefore, there is a need for interventions to improve their safety. The aim of our study was to explore the use of safety measures before and after an educational intervention among women who have reported DV during pregnancy. Materials and methods: Of 1010 pregnant women screened consecutively for DV using the Abuse Assessment Screen (AAS) during routine antenatal care, 181 women reported domestic violence. All 1010 participating pregnant women were taught 15 safety measures using a locally developed flipchart. We obtained contact with 80 of the 181 eligible women postpartum, of whom 62 completed the follow-up assessment. We explored and described the use of safety measures at baseline and follow-up, using a standardized instrument called the Safety Behavior Checklist. Results: At follow-up, less than half of the women (n = 30, or 48.3%) reported any form of DV. Of the women who reported DV at follow-up, significantly more reported the experience of both violence and fear at baseline (21.9%, p = 0.01) compared with the women who did not report DV at followup (3.3%, p = 0.01). Women reporting DV at baseline and follow-up used more safety measures at baseline (56) and follow-up (80) compared with women reporting DV at baseline only (36 and 46). Women reporting DV at baseline and follow-up used more safety measures for the first time at follow-up, 57 new measures compared with the 28 new measures used by women reporting DV at baseline only. Conclusions: The use of a flipchart teaching session on safety measures within antenatal care may increase the number of safety measures women use to protect themselves during pregnancy and decrease the risks of adverse health effects of DV.
AB - Introduction: Domestic violence (DV) during pregnancy is associated with poor health outcomes for both the mother and newborn, and sometimes death. In a low-income country like Nepal, women have few options to leave abusive situations. Therefore, there is a need for interventions to improve their safety. The aim of our study was to explore the use of safety measures before and after an educational intervention among women who have reported DV during pregnancy. Materials and methods: Of 1010 pregnant women screened consecutively for DV using the Abuse Assessment Screen (AAS) during routine antenatal care, 181 women reported domestic violence. All 1010 participating pregnant women were taught 15 safety measures using a locally developed flipchart. We obtained contact with 80 of the 181 eligible women postpartum, of whom 62 completed the follow-up assessment. We explored and described the use of safety measures at baseline and follow-up, using a standardized instrument called the Safety Behavior Checklist. Results: At follow-up, less than half of the women (n = 30, or 48.3%) reported any form of DV. Of the women who reported DV at follow-up, significantly more reported the experience of both violence and fear at baseline (21.9%, p = 0.01) compared with the women who did not report DV at followup (3.3%, p = 0.01). Women reporting DV at baseline and follow-up used more safety measures at baseline (56) and follow-up (80) compared with women reporting DV at baseline only (36 and 46). Women reporting DV at baseline and follow-up used more safety measures for the first time at follow-up, 57 new measures compared with the 28 new measures used by women reporting DV at baseline only. Conclusions: The use of a flipchart teaching session on safety measures within antenatal care may increase the number of safety measures women use to protect themselves during pregnancy and decrease the risks of adverse health effects of DV.
KW - Antenatal care
KW - Domestic violence
KW - Intervention
KW - Nepal
KW - Pregnancy
KW - Safety behaviors
KW - Safety measures
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082790906&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85082790906&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/ijerph17072268
DO - 10.3390/ijerph17072268
M3 - Article
C2 - 32230945
AN - SCOPUS:85082790906
SN - 1661-7827
VL - 17
JO - International journal of environmental research and public health
JF - International journal of environmental research and public health
IS - 7
M1 - 2268
ER -