Improving on-line information for potential living kidney donors

E. M. Moody, K. K. Clemens, L. Storsley, A. Waterman, C. R. Parikh, A. X. Garg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Scopus citations


Individuals who consider becoming living kidney donors often search the internet for reliable information before contacting the transplant center. The quality of such information requires due consideration. Using the search engines Google and Yahoo and the WebMD information portal, two reviewers independently abstracted data on the classification, readability, and general quality of websites. The coverage and accuracy of each site's discussion of the risks, benefits, and process of living donation was also assessed against a checklist of recommended information. Eighty-six unique websites on living kidney donation were found. Most were created by transplant programs and transplant organizations. Although the content of most sites was accurate, almost all (98%) were written above the recommended patient reading level (i.e., fifth grade). On average, each site covered 38% of the recommended information on living donation (range 8-76%). Educational topics of potential long-term medical risks, psychological risks, and expected benefits to the donor were often missing. The most visited websites were often not ranked among the best sites to provide information. By better understanding the nature of on-line information, transplant professionals can direct their patients to the best available websites. Local educational efforts, including the effective use of internet resources, will ensure living donation and complete understanding of the risks by potential donors and recipients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1062-1070
Number of pages9
JournalKidney international
Issue number10
StatePublished - May 14 2007
Externally publishedYes


  • Health information
  • Internet
  • Living kidney donation
  • Worldwide web

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology


Dive into the research topics of 'Improving on-line information for potential living kidney donors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this