Implementing survivorship care planning in two contrasting health systems: lessons learned from a randomized controlled trial

Katherine C. Smith, Sharon White, Jennifer DeSanto, Susan Hannum, Nancy Mayonado, Nita Ahuja, Janice Bowie, David Cowall, Joan Mischtschuk, Kimberly Peairs, Elissa Thorner, Phuoc Tran, Antonio Wolff, Claire Snyder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: Survivorship care plans (SCPs) are recommended to promote appropriate follow-up care, but implementation has been limited. We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing three SCP delivery models in two health systems. We utilize mixed methods to compare the feasibility and participants’ perceived value of the three models. Methods: Patients completing treatment for stage I–III breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer from one urban-academic and one rural community cancer center were randomized to (1) mailed SCP, (2) SCP delivered during an in-person survivorship visit, or (3) SCP delivered during an in-person survivorship visit plus 6-month follow-up. Clinics had flexibility in intervention implementation. Quantitative data summarize intervention fidelity and protocol deviations. Qualitative interview data provide patients’ perspectives on feasibility and intervention value. Results: Of 475 eligible participants approached, 378 (79%) were randomized. Of 345 SCPs delivered, 265 (76.8%) were by protocol. Protocol deviations were more common at the urban-academic center. In post-study qualitative interviews, participants recalled little about the SCP document or visit(s). SCPs were valued for information and care coordination, although their static nature was limiting, and sometimes SCP information differed from that provided elsewhere. Visits were opportunities for care and reassurance, but time and distance to the clinic were barriers. Conclusions: SCP provision was challenging. Patients were interested in SCP, but not necessarily additional survivorship visits, particularly at the urban-academic hospital. Implications for Cancer Survivors: These findings suggest that patients value careful consideration of health care needs during the transition out of treatment; SCP documents are one element of this. For many patients, models without additional visits and dynamic SCPs may be preferred.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)791-800
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Cancer Survivorship
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2022

Keywords

  • Feasibility
  • Implementation
  • Mixed methods
  • Survivorship care planning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology(nursing)
  • Oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Implementing survivorship care planning in two contrasting health systems: lessons learned from a randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this