Implementing Enhanced Recovery Pathways: A Qualitative Study of Factors That Distinguished Higher Performing Hospitals

Christina T. Yuan, Junbo Wu, Chelsea P. Cardell, Tasnuva M. Liu, Benjamin Eidman, Deborah Hobson, Elizabeth C. Wick, Michael Rosen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to explore barriers and facilitators to implementing enhanced recovery pathways, with a focus on identifying factors that distinguished hospitals achieving greater levels of implementation success. Background: Despite the clinical effectiveness of enhanced recovery pathways, the implementation of these complex interventions varies widely. While there is a growing list of contextual factors that may affect implementation, little is known about which factors distinguish between higher and lower levels of implementation success. Methods: We conducted in-depth interviews with 168 perioperative leaders, clinicians, and staff from 8 US hospitals participating in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we coded interview transcripts and conducted a thematic analysis of implementation barriers and facilitators. We also rated the perceived effect of factors on different levels of implementation success, as measured by hospitals' adherence with 9 process measures over time. Results: Across all hospitals, factors with a consistently positive effect on implementation included information-sharing practices and the implementation processes of planning and engaging. Consistently negative factors included the complexity of the pathway itself, hospitals' infrastructure, and the implementation process of "executing" (particularly in altering electronic health record systems). Hospitals with the greatest improvement in process measure adherence were distinguished by clinicians' positive knowledge and beliefs about pathways and strong leadership support from both clinicians and executives. Conclusion: We draw upon diverse perspectives from across the perioperative continuum of care to qualitatively describe implementation factors most strongly associated with successful implementation of enhanced recovery pathways.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)789-795
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of surgery
Volume279
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2024

Keywords

  • enhanced recovery
  • implementation
  • perioperative standardization
  • qualitative
  • quality improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Implementing Enhanced Recovery Pathways: A Qualitative Study of Factors That Distinguished Higher Performing Hospitals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this