Implementation of a prehospital whole blood program: Lessons learned

Matt Levy, Eric M. Garfinkel, Robert May, Eric Cohn, Zachary Tillett, Christopher Wend, Robert A. Sikorksi, Ruben Troncoso, J Lee Jenkins, Timothy P. Chizmar, Asa M. Margolis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Early blood administration by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) to patients suffering from hemorrhagic shock improves outcomes. Prehospital blood programs represent an invaluable resuscitation capability that directly addresses hemorrhagic shock and mitigates subsequent multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Prehospital blood programs must be thoughtfully planned, have multiple safeguards, ensure adequate training and credentialing processes, and be responsible stewards of blood resources. According to the 2022 best practices model by Yazer et al, the four key pillars of a successful prehospital program include the following: (1) the rationale for the use and a description of blood products that can be transfused in the prehospital setting, (2) storage of blood products outside the hospital blood bank and how to move them to the patient in the prehospital setting, (3) prehospital transfusion criteria and administration personnel, and (4) documentation of prehospital transfusion and handover to the hospital team. This concepts paper describes our operational experience using these four pillars to make Maryland's inaugural prehospital ground-based low-titer O-positive whole blood program successful. These lessons learned may inform other EMS systems as they establish prehospital blood programs to help improve outcomes and enhance mass casualty response.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere13142
JournalJACEP Open
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2024

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Implementation of a prehospital whole blood program: Lessons learned'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this