TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of pre-dialysis nephrology care engagement and decision-making on provider and patient action toward permanent vascular access
AU - Grubbs, Vanessa
AU - Jaar, Bernard G.
AU - Cavanaugh, Kerri L.
AU - Ephraim, Patti L.
AU - Ameling, Jessica M.
AU - Cook, Courtney
AU - Greer, Raquel C.
AU - Boulware, L. Ebony
N1 - Funding Information:
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health, the Veterans Administration, or the United States Government.
Funding Information:
This project was supported by grant 1R34DK094116 from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease (NIDDK). RCG was supported by K23DK094975 from the NIDDK. KLC was additionally supported by K23DK080952. This material is the result of work supported with resources and the use of facilities at the Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Background: While catheters are often thought the result of emergency hemodialysis (HD) initiation among patients with little or no pre-dialysis nephrology care, the role of patient level of engagement in care and modality decision-making have not been fully explored. Methods: This is a retrospective medical record review of adults (age 18–89 years) who received care in academically affiliated private practice, public hospital, or Veterans Administration settings prior to initiating HD with a catheter between 10/1/2011 and 9/30/2012. Primary predictors were level of patient engagement in nephrology care within 6 months of HD initiation and timing of modality decision-making. Primary outcomes were provider action (referral) and any patient action (evaluation by a vascular surgeon, vein mapping or vascular surgery) toward [arteriovenous fistula or graft, (AVF/AVG)] creation. Results: Among 92 incident HD patients, 66% (n = 61) initiated HD via catheter, of whom 34% (n = 21) had ideal engagement in care but 42% (n = 25) had no documented decision. Providers referred 48% (n = 29) of patients for AVF/AVG, of whom 72% (n = 21) took any action. Ideal engagement in care predicted provider action (adjusted OR 13.7 [95% CI 1.08, 175.1], p = 0.04), but no level of engagement in care predicted patient action (p > 0.3). Compared to patients with no documented decision, those with documented decisions within 3, 3–12, or more than 12 months before initiating dialysis were more likely to have provider action toward AVF/AVG (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 9.0 [1.4,55.6], p = 0.2, 37.6 [3.3423.4] p = 0.003, and 4.8 [0.8, 30.6], p = 0.1, respectively); and patient action (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 18.7 [2.3, 149.0], p = 0.006, 20.4 [2.6, 160.0], p = 0.004, and 6.2 [0.9, 44.0], p = 0.07, respectively). Conclusions: Timing of patient modality decision-making, but not level of engagement in pre-dialysis nephrology care, was predictive of patient and provider action toward AVF/AVG Interventions addressing patients’ psychological preparation for dialysis are needed.
AB - Background: While catheters are often thought the result of emergency hemodialysis (HD) initiation among patients with little or no pre-dialysis nephrology care, the role of patient level of engagement in care and modality decision-making have not been fully explored. Methods: This is a retrospective medical record review of adults (age 18–89 years) who received care in academically affiliated private practice, public hospital, or Veterans Administration settings prior to initiating HD with a catheter between 10/1/2011 and 9/30/2012. Primary predictors were level of patient engagement in nephrology care within 6 months of HD initiation and timing of modality decision-making. Primary outcomes were provider action (referral) and any patient action (evaluation by a vascular surgeon, vein mapping or vascular surgery) toward [arteriovenous fistula or graft, (AVF/AVG)] creation. Results: Among 92 incident HD patients, 66% (n = 61) initiated HD via catheter, of whom 34% (n = 21) had ideal engagement in care but 42% (n = 25) had no documented decision. Providers referred 48% (n = 29) of patients for AVF/AVG, of whom 72% (n = 21) took any action. Ideal engagement in care predicted provider action (adjusted OR 13.7 [95% CI 1.08, 175.1], p = 0.04), but no level of engagement in care predicted patient action (p > 0.3). Compared to patients with no documented decision, those with documented decisions within 3, 3–12, or more than 12 months before initiating dialysis were more likely to have provider action toward AVF/AVG (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 9.0 [1.4,55.6], p = 0.2, 37.6 [3.3423.4] p = 0.003, and 4.8 [0.8, 30.6], p = 0.1, respectively); and patient action (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 18.7 [2.3, 149.0], p = 0.006, 20.4 [2.6, 160.0], p = 0.004, and 6.2 [0.9, 44.0], p = 0.07, respectively). Conclusions: Timing of patient modality decision-making, but not level of engagement in pre-dialysis nephrology care, was predictive of patient and provider action toward AVF/AVG Interventions addressing patients’ psychological preparation for dialysis are needed.
KW - Hemodialysis
KW - Patient decision-making
KW - Pre-dialysis nephrology care
KW - Vascular access
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100878620&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100878620&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12882-021-02264-7
DO - 10.1186/s12882-021-02264-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 33593328
AN - SCOPUS:85100878620
SN - 1471-2369
VL - 22
JO - BMC Nephrology
JF - BMC Nephrology
IS - 1
M1 - 60
ER -