TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of 3-tier formularies on drug treatment of attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder in children
AU - Huskamp, Haiden A.
AU - Deverka, Patricia A.
AU - Epstein, Arnold M.
AU - Epstein, Robert S.
AU - McGuigan, Kimberly A.
AU - Muriel, Anna C.
AU - Frank, Richard G.
PY - 2005/4
Y1 - 2005/4
N2 - Background: Expenditures for medications used to treat attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children have increased rapidly. Many employers and health plans have adopted 3-tier formularies in an attempt to control costs for these and other drugs. Objective: To assess the effect of copayment increases associated with 3-tier formulary adoption on use and spending patterns for ADHD medications for children. Design and Setting: Observational study using quasi-experimental design to compare effects on ADHD medication use and spending for children enrolled as dependents in an employer-sponsored plan that made major changes to its pharmacy benefit design and a comparison group of children covered by the same insurer. The plan simultaneously moved from a 1-tier (same copayment required for all drugs) to a 3-tier formulary and implemented an across-the-board copayment increase. The plan later moved 3 drugs from tier 3 to tier 2. Participants: An intervention group of 20 326 and a comparison group of 15776 children aged 18 years and younger. Main Outcome Measures: Monthly probability of using an ADHD medication; plan, enrollee, and total ADHD medication spending; and medication continuation. Results: A 3-tier formulary implementation resulted in a 17% decrease in the monthly probability of using medication (P<.001), a 20% decrease in expected total medication expenditures, and a substantial shifting of costs from the plan to families (P<.001). Intervention group children using medications in the pre-period were more likely to change to a medication in a different tier after 3-tier adoption, relative to the comparison group (P=.08). The subsequent tier changes resulted in increased plan spending (P<.001) and decreased patient spending (P=.003) for users but no differences in continuation. Conclusions: The copayment increases associated with 3-tier formulary implementation by 1 employer resulted in lower total ADHD medication spending, sizeable increases in out-of-pocket expenditures for families of children with ADHD, and a significant decrease in the probability of using these medications.
AB - Background: Expenditures for medications used to treat attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children have increased rapidly. Many employers and health plans have adopted 3-tier formularies in an attempt to control costs for these and other drugs. Objective: To assess the effect of copayment increases associated with 3-tier formulary adoption on use and spending patterns for ADHD medications for children. Design and Setting: Observational study using quasi-experimental design to compare effects on ADHD medication use and spending for children enrolled as dependents in an employer-sponsored plan that made major changes to its pharmacy benefit design and a comparison group of children covered by the same insurer. The plan simultaneously moved from a 1-tier (same copayment required for all drugs) to a 3-tier formulary and implemented an across-the-board copayment increase. The plan later moved 3 drugs from tier 3 to tier 2. Participants: An intervention group of 20 326 and a comparison group of 15776 children aged 18 years and younger. Main Outcome Measures: Monthly probability of using an ADHD medication; plan, enrollee, and total ADHD medication spending; and medication continuation. Results: A 3-tier formulary implementation resulted in a 17% decrease in the monthly probability of using medication (P<.001), a 20% decrease in expected total medication expenditures, and a substantial shifting of costs from the plan to families (P<.001). Intervention group children using medications in the pre-period were more likely to change to a medication in a different tier after 3-tier adoption, relative to the comparison group (P=.08). The subsequent tier changes resulted in increased plan spending (P<.001) and decreased patient spending (P=.003) for users but no differences in continuation. Conclusions: The copayment increases associated with 3-tier formulary implementation by 1 employer resulted in lower total ADHD medication spending, sizeable increases in out-of-pocket expenditures for families of children with ADHD, and a significant decrease in the probability of using these medications.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=16344364878&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=16344364878&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/archpsyc.62.4.435
DO - 10.1001/archpsyc.62.4.435
M3 - Article
C2 - 15809411
AN - SCOPUS:16344364878
SN - 0003-990X
VL - 62
SP - 435
EP - 441
JO - Archives of general psychiatry
JF - Archives of general psychiatry
IS - 4
ER -