TY - JOUR
T1 - Immunoassays for diagnosis of infectious diseases
AU - Yolken, Robert H.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Wa-473/4-1, and from the National Large Bowel Program, National Cancer Institute, Grant CA 37808. We wish to thank Karen Rickard for expert technical assistance, and Dr. Y. H. Joy Yang for production of monoclonal antibodies.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by contract N01-AI-52579f rom the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases.
PY - 1990/1/1
Y1 - 1990/1/1
N2 - Immunoassays have a number of advantages for infectious disease diagnosis. These advantages are based on the sensitivity and specificity inherent in antigen–antibody interactions. While there are a number of immunoassay systems that can be used for the direct detection of infectious antigens in human body fluids, solid-phase immunoassay techniques have attained widespread usage for this purpose. There are a number of possible solutions to the problems inherent in the direct linkage of enzymes to immunoglobulins. For example, immunoassays can be performed in indirect formats in which an unlabeled primary antimicrobial immunoglobulin is reacted with immobilized antigens and the resultant complex is quantified by an enzyme-conjugated second antibody. More importantly, the species specificity of many anti-immunoglobulin conjugates is not absolute. Nonspecific binding can generate high background levels or, in certain cases, false-positive reactions. The same problem is inherent in the use of other immunoglobulin-binding macromolecules such as staphylococcal protein A.
AB - Immunoassays have a number of advantages for infectious disease diagnosis. These advantages are based on the sensitivity and specificity inherent in antigen–antibody interactions. While there are a number of immunoassay systems that can be used for the direct detection of infectious antigens in human body fluids, solid-phase immunoassay techniques have attained widespread usage for this purpose. There are a number of possible solutions to the problems inherent in the direct linkage of enzymes to immunoglobulins. For example, immunoassays can be performed in indirect formats in which an unlabeled primary antimicrobial immunoglobulin is reacted with immobilized antigens and the resultant complex is quantified by an enzyme-conjugated second antibody. More importantly, the species specificity of many anti-immunoglobulin conjugates is not absolute. Nonspecific binding can generate high background levels or, in certain cases, false-positive reactions. The same problem is inherent in the use of other immunoglobulin-binding macromolecules such as staphylococcal protein A.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025375258&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025375258&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0076-6879(90)84315-8
DO - 10.1016/0076-6879(90)84315-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 2388587
AN - SCOPUS:0025375258
SN - 0076-6879
VL - 184
SP - 529
EP - 537
JO - Methods in enzymology
JF - Methods in enzymology
IS - C
ER -