TY - JOUR
T1 - Immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced upper and lower tract urothelial carcinoma
T2 - a comparison of outcomes
AU - Esagian, Stepan M.
AU - Khaki, Ali Raza
AU - Diamantopoulos, Leonidas N.
AU - Carril-Ajuria, Lucia
AU - Castellano, Daniel
AU - De Kouchkovsky, Ivan
AU - Park, Joseph J.
AU - Alva, Ajjai
AU - Bilen, Mehmet A.
AU - Stewart, Tyler F.
AU - McKay, Rana R.
AU - Santos, Victor S.
AU - Agarwal, Neeraj
AU - Jain, Jayanshu
AU - Zakharia, Yousef
AU - Morales-Barrera, Rafael
AU - Devitt, Michael E.
AU - Nelson, Ariel
AU - Hoimes, Christopher J.
AU - Shreck, Evan
AU - Gartrell, Benjamin A.
AU - Sankin, Alex
AU - Tripathi, Abhishek
AU - Zakopoulou, Roubini
AU - Bamias, Aristotelis
AU - Rodriguez-Vida, Alejo
AU - Drakaki, Alexandra
AU - Liu, Sandy
AU - Kumar, Vivek
AU - Lythgoe, Mark P.
AU - Pinato, David J.
AU - Murgic, Jure
AU - Fröbe, Ana
AU - Joshi, Monika
AU - Isaacsson Velho, Pedro
AU - Hahn, Noah
AU - Alonso Buznego, Lucia
AU - Duran, Ignacio
AU - Moses, Marcus
AU - Barata, Pedro
AU - Galsky, Matthew D.
AU - Sonpavde, Guru
AU - Yu, Evan Y.
AU - Msaouel, Pavlos
AU - Koshkin, Vadim S.
AU - Grivas, Petros
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors BJU International © 2021 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2021/8
Y1 - 2021/8
N2 - Objectives: To compare clinical outcomes between patients with locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (aUC) in the upper and lower urinary tract receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study collecting clinicopathological, treatment, and outcome data for patients with aUC receiving ICIs from 2013 to 2020 across 24 institutions. We compared the objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with upper and lower tract UC (UTUC, LTUC). Uni- and multivariable logistic and Cox regression were used to assess the effect of UTUC on ORR, OS, and PFS. Subgroup analyses were performed stratified based on histology (pure, mixed) and line of treatment (first line, subsequent line). Results: Out of a total of 746 eligible patients, 707, 717, and 738 were included in the ORR, OS, and PFS analyses, respectively. Our results did not contradict the hypothesis that patients with UTUC and LTUC had similar ORRs (24% vs 28%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43–1.24), OS (median 9.8 vs 9.6 months; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.93, 95% CI 0.73–1.19), and PFS (median 4.3 vs 4.1 months; aHR 1.01, 95% CI 0.81–1.27). Patients with mixed-histology UTUC had a significantly lower ORR and shorter PFS vs mixed-histology LTUC (aOR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05–0.91 and aHR 1.66, 95% CI 1.06–2.59), respectively). Conclusion: Overall, patients with UTUC and LTUC receiving ICIs have comparable treatment response and outcomes. Subgroup analyses based on histology showed that those with mixed-histology UTUC had a lower ORR and shorter PFS compared to mixed-histology LTUC. Further studies and evaluation of molecular biomarkers can help refine patient selection for immunotherapy.
AB - Objectives: To compare clinical outcomes between patients with locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (aUC) in the upper and lower urinary tract receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study collecting clinicopathological, treatment, and outcome data for patients with aUC receiving ICIs from 2013 to 2020 across 24 institutions. We compared the objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with upper and lower tract UC (UTUC, LTUC). Uni- and multivariable logistic and Cox regression were used to assess the effect of UTUC on ORR, OS, and PFS. Subgroup analyses were performed stratified based on histology (pure, mixed) and line of treatment (first line, subsequent line). Results: Out of a total of 746 eligible patients, 707, 717, and 738 were included in the ORR, OS, and PFS analyses, respectively. Our results did not contradict the hypothesis that patients with UTUC and LTUC had similar ORRs (24% vs 28%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43–1.24), OS (median 9.8 vs 9.6 months; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.93, 95% CI 0.73–1.19), and PFS (median 4.3 vs 4.1 months; aHR 1.01, 95% CI 0.81–1.27). Patients with mixed-histology UTUC had a significantly lower ORR and shorter PFS vs mixed-histology LTUC (aOR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05–0.91 and aHR 1.66, 95% CI 1.06–2.59), respectively). Conclusion: Overall, patients with UTUC and LTUC receiving ICIs have comparable treatment response and outcomes. Subgroup analyses based on histology showed that those with mixed-histology UTUC had a lower ORR and shorter PFS compared to mixed-histology LTUC. Further studies and evaluation of molecular biomarkers can help refine patient selection for immunotherapy.
KW - #uroonc
KW - #utuc
KW - bladder cancer
KW - checkpoint inhibitor
KW - immunotherapy
KW - upper tract urothelial cancer
KW - variant histology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100561925&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100561925&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/bju.15324
DO - 10.1111/bju.15324
M3 - Article
C2 - 33556233
AN - SCOPUS:85100561925
SN - 1464-4096
VL - 128
SP - 196
EP - 205
JO - BJU International
JF - BJU International
IS - 2
ER -