TY - JOUR
T1 - Imaging characteristics of symptomatic vertebral artery dissection a systematic review
AU - Gottesman, Rebecca F.
AU - Sharma, Priti
AU - Robinson, Karen A.
AU - Arnan, Martinson
AU - Tsui, Megan
AU - Saber-Tehrani, Ali
AU - Newman-Toker, David E.
PY - 2012/9
Y1 - 2012/9
N2 - Background: Vertebral artery dissection (VAD) is an important cause of stroke in the young. VAD can present with a range of imaging findings. We sought to summarize the diagnostic value of various imaging findings in patients with symptomatic VAD. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of observational studies, searching electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE) for Englishlanguage manuscripts with >5 subjects with clinical or radiologic features of VAD. Two independent reviewers selected studies for inclusion; a third adjudicated differences. Studies were assessed for methodological quality and imaging data were abstracted. Pooled proportions were calculated. Results: Of 3996 citations, we screened 511 manuscripts and selected 75 studies describing 1972 VAD patients. Most studies utilized conventional angiography or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) to diagnose VAD; computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and Doppler ultrasonography were described less frequently. Imaging findings reported were vertebral artery stenosis (51%), string and pearls (48%), arterial dilation (37%), arterial occlusion (36%), and pseudoaneurysm, double lumen, and intimal flap (22% each). In cases where conventional angiography was the reference standard, CTA was more sensitive (100%) than either MRA (77%) or Doppler ultrasonography (71%) (P = 0.001). Conclusions: Imaging findings vary widely in patients with VAD, with no single radiographic sign present in the majority of VAD patients. Nonspecific radiographic signs predominate. CTA probably has greater sensitivity for dissection than MRA or ultrasound relative to conventional angiography. Higher quality studies on imaging techniques and radiographic criteria in subjects with VAD are needed. Future studies should compare imaging techniques in well-defined, undifferentiated populations of clinical VAD suspects.
AB - Background: Vertebral artery dissection (VAD) is an important cause of stroke in the young. VAD can present with a range of imaging findings. We sought to summarize the diagnostic value of various imaging findings in patients with symptomatic VAD. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of observational studies, searching electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE) for Englishlanguage manuscripts with >5 subjects with clinical or radiologic features of VAD. Two independent reviewers selected studies for inclusion; a third adjudicated differences. Studies were assessed for methodological quality and imaging data were abstracted. Pooled proportions were calculated. Results: Of 3996 citations, we screened 511 manuscripts and selected 75 studies describing 1972 VAD patients. Most studies utilized conventional angiography or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) to diagnose VAD; computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and Doppler ultrasonography were described less frequently. Imaging findings reported were vertebral artery stenosis (51%), string and pearls (48%), arterial dilation (37%), arterial occlusion (36%), and pseudoaneurysm, double lumen, and intimal flap (22% each). In cases where conventional angiography was the reference standard, CTA was more sensitive (100%) than either MRA (77%) or Doppler ultrasonography (71%) (P = 0.001). Conclusions: Imaging findings vary widely in patients with VAD, with no single radiographic sign present in the majority of VAD patients. Nonspecific radiographic signs predominate. CTA probably has greater sensitivity for dissection than MRA or ultrasound relative to conventional angiography. Higher quality studies on imaging techniques and radiographic criteria in subjects with VAD are needed. Future studies should compare imaging techniques in well-defined, undifferentiated populations of clinical VAD suspects.
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Neuroimaging
KW - Vertebral artery dissection
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865968720&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865968720&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/NRL.0b013e3182675511
DO - 10.1097/NRL.0b013e3182675511
M3 - Review article
C2 - 22931729
AN - SCOPUS:84865968720
SN - 1074-7931
VL - 18
SP - 255
EP - 260
JO - Neurologist
JF - Neurologist
IS - 5
ER -