TY - JOUR
T1 - Illuminating the decision-making strategies of anesthesia providers in challenging cases
AU - Biro, Joshua
AU - Neyens, David M.
AU - Jaruzel, Candace
AU - Tobin, Catherine D.
AU - Alfred, Myrtede
AU - Coppola, Sarah
AU - Abernathy, James H.
AU - Catchpole, Ken R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Medication errors and error-related scenarios in anesthesia remain an important area of research. Interventions and best practice recommendations in anesthesia are often based in the work-as-imagined healthcare system, remaining under-used due to a range of unforeseen complexities in healthcare work-as-done. In order to design adaptable anesthesia medication delivery systems, a better understanding of clinical cognition within the context of anesthesia work is needed. Fourteen interviews probing anesthesia providers’ decision making were performed. The results revealed three overarching themes: (1) anesthesia providers find cases challenging when they have incomplete information, (2) decision-making begins with information seeking, and (3) attributes such as expertise, experience, and work environment influence anesthesia providers’ information seeking and synthesis of tasks. These themes and the context within this data help create a more realistic view of work-as-done and generate insights into what potential medication error reducing interventions should look to avoid and what they could help facilitate.
AB - Medication errors and error-related scenarios in anesthesia remain an important area of research. Interventions and best practice recommendations in anesthesia are often based in the work-as-imagined healthcare system, remaining under-used due to a range of unforeseen complexities in healthcare work-as-done. In order to design adaptable anesthesia medication delivery systems, a better understanding of clinical cognition within the context of anesthesia work is needed. Fourteen interviews probing anesthesia providers’ decision making were performed. The results revealed three overarching themes: (1) anesthesia providers find cases challenging when they have incomplete information, (2) decision-making begins with information seeking, and (3) attributes such as expertise, experience, and work environment influence anesthesia providers’ information seeking and synthesis of tasks. These themes and the context within this data help create a more realistic view of work-as-done and generate insights into what potential medication error reducing interventions should look to avoid and what they could help facilitate.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132414111&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85132414111&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1071181320641149
DO - 10.1177/1071181320641149
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85132414111
SN - 1071-1813
VL - 64
SP - 653
EP - 657
JO - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
JF - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
IS - 1
T2 - 64th International Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2020
Y2 - 5 October 2020 through 9 October 2020
ER -