Illuminating the decision-making strategies of anesthesia providers in challenging cases

Joshua Biro, David M. Neyens, Candace Jaruzel, Catherine D. Tobin, Myrtede Alfred, Sarah Coppola, James H. Abernathy, Ken R. Catchpole

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

Abstract

Medication errors and error-related scenarios in anesthesia remain an important area of research. Interventions and best practice recommendations in anesthesia are often based in the work-as-imagined healthcare system, remaining under-used due to a range of unforeseen complexities in healthcare work-as-done. In order to design adaptable anesthesia medication delivery systems, a better understanding of clinical cognition within the context of anesthesia work is needed. Fourteen interviews probing anesthesia providers’ decision making were performed. The results revealed three overarching themes: (1) anesthesia providers find cases challenging when they have incomplete information, (2) decision-making begins with information seeking, and (3) attributes such as expertise, experience, and work environment influence anesthesia providers’ information seeking and synthesis of tasks. These themes and the context within this data help create a more realistic view of work-as-done and generate insights into what potential medication error reducing interventions should look to avoid and what they could help facilitate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)653-657
Number of pages5
JournalProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Volume64
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020
Event64th International Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2020 - Virtual, Online
Duration: Oct 5 2020Oct 9 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Illuminating the decision-making strategies of anesthesia providers in challenging cases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this