TY - JOUR
T1 - How Should the 3 R's Be Revised and Why?
AU - Critser, Rebecca
AU - Locke, Paul
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright 2024 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2024/9/1
Y1 - 2024/9/1
N2 - The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique established what many know today as the "3 R's"-refinement, reduction, and replacement-when it was published in 1959. Since their formulation, these principles have guided decision-making for many about nonhuman animal subjects' uses in laboratory-based research. Discussion about how to amend or replace the 3 R's is ongoing, driven mainly by philosophical ethics approaches to nonhuman animal rights and by scientific advancement. This article explores merits and drawbacks of possible updates to and interpretations of the 3 R's.
AB - The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique established what many know today as the "3 R's"-refinement, reduction, and replacement-when it was published in 1959. Since their formulation, these principles have guided decision-making for many about nonhuman animal subjects' uses in laboratory-based research. Discussion about how to amend or replace the 3 R's is ongoing, driven mainly by philosophical ethics approaches to nonhuman animal rights and by scientific advancement. This article explores merits and drawbacks of possible updates to and interpretations of the 3 R's.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203754196&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85203754196&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/amajethics.2024.724
DO - 10.1001/amajethics.2024.724
M3 - Article
C2 - 39250945
AN - SCOPUS:85203754196
SN - 2376-6980
VL - 26
SP - E724-E729
JO - AMA Journal of Ethics
JF - AMA Journal of Ethics
IS - 9
ER -