How Should the 3 R's Be Revised and Why?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique established what many know today as the "3 R's"-refinement, reduction, and replacement-when it was published in 1959. Since their formulation, these principles have guided decision-making for many about nonhuman animal subjects' uses in laboratory-based research. Discussion about how to amend or replace the 3 R's is ongoing, driven mainly by philosophical ethics approaches to nonhuman animal rights and by scientific advancement. This article explores merits and drawbacks of possible updates to and interpretations of the 3 R's.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E724-E729
JournalAMA Journal of Ethics
Volume26
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2024

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How Should the 3 R's Be Revised and Why?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this