TY - JOUR
T1 - Higher Survival With the Use of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Compared With Conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Children Following Cardiac Surgery
T2 - Results of an Analysis of the Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation Registry*
AU - Kobayashi, Ryan L.
AU - Gauvreau, Kimberlee
AU - Alexander, Peta M.A.
AU - Teele, Sarah A.
AU - Fynn-Thompson, Francis
AU - Lasa, Javier J.
AU - Bembea, Melania
AU - Thiagarajan, Ravi R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - OBJECTIVES: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to support cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is increasingly used in children suffering cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery. However, its efficacy in promoting survival has not been evaluated. We compared survival of pediatric cardiac surgery patients suffering inhospital cardiac arrest who were resuscitated with extracorporeal CPR (E-CPR) to those resuscitated with conventional CPR (C-CPR) using propensity matching. DESIGN: Retrospective study using multicenter data from the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry (2008–2020). SETTING: Multicenter cardiac arrest database containing cardiac arrest and CPR data from U.S. hospitals. PATIENTS: Cardiac surgical patients younger than 18 years old who suffered inhospital cardiac arrest and received greater than or equal to 10 minutes of CPR. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 1223 patients, 741 (60.6%) received C-CPR and 482 (39.4%) received E-CPR. E-CPR utilization increased over the study period (p < 0.001). Duration of CPR was longer in E-CPR compared with C-CPR recipients (42 vs. 26 min; p < 0.001). In a propensity score matched cohort (382 E-CPR recipients, 382 C-CPR recipients), E-CPR recipients had survival to discharge (odds ratio [OR], 2.22; 95% CI, 1.7–2.9; p < 0.001). E-CPR survival was only higher when CPR duration was greater than 18 minutes. Propensity matched analysis using patients from institutions contributing at least one E-CPR case (n = 35 centers; 353 E-CPR recipients, 353 C-CPR recipients) similarly demonstrated improved survival in E-CPR recipients compared with those who received C-CPR alone (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.6–2.8; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: E-CPR compared with C-CPR improved survival in children suffering cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery requiring CPR greater than or equal to 10 minutes.
AB - OBJECTIVES: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to support cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is increasingly used in children suffering cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery. However, its efficacy in promoting survival has not been evaluated. We compared survival of pediatric cardiac surgery patients suffering inhospital cardiac arrest who were resuscitated with extracorporeal CPR (E-CPR) to those resuscitated with conventional CPR (C-CPR) using propensity matching. DESIGN: Retrospective study using multicenter data from the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry (2008–2020). SETTING: Multicenter cardiac arrest database containing cardiac arrest and CPR data from U.S. hospitals. PATIENTS: Cardiac surgical patients younger than 18 years old who suffered inhospital cardiac arrest and received greater than or equal to 10 minutes of CPR. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 1223 patients, 741 (60.6%) received C-CPR and 482 (39.4%) received E-CPR. E-CPR utilization increased over the study period (p < 0.001). Duration of CPR was longer in E-CPR compared with C-CPR recipients (42 vs. 26 min; p < 0.001). In a propensity score matched cohort (382 E-CPR recipients, 382 C-CPR recipients), E-CPR recipients had survival to discharge (odds ratio [OR], 2.22; 95% CI, 1.7–2.9; p < 0.001). E-CPR survival was only higher when CPR duration was greater than 18 minutes. Propensity matched analysis using patients from institutions contributing at least one E-CPR case (n = 35 centers; 353 E-CPR recipients, 353 C-CPR recipients) similarly demonstrated improved survival in E-CPR recipients compared with those who received C-CPR alone (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.6–2.8; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: E-CPR compared with C-CPR improved survival in children suffering cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery requiring CPR greater than or equal to 10 minutes.
KW - cardiac surgery
KW - cardiopulmonary resuscitation
KW - extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
KW - pediatrics
KW - resuscitation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85187956895&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85187956895&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006103
DO - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006103
M3 - Article
C2 - 37938044
AN - SCOPUS:85187956895
SN - 0090-3493
VL - 52
SP - 563
EP - 573
JO - Critical care medicine
JF - Critical care medicine
IS - 4
ER -