TY - JOUR
T1 - Heterogeneity of Intermediate Care Organization Within a Single Healthcare System
AU - Case, Aaron S.
AU - Hochberg, Chad H.
AU - Koirala, Binu
AU - Flanagan, Eleni
AU - Chatterjee, Souvik
AU - Checkley, William N.
AU - Gurses, Ayse P.
AU - Hager, David N.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 The Authors.
PY - 2025/1/22
Y1 - 2025/1/22
N2 - Intermediate care (IC) is prevalent nationwide, but little is known about how to best organize this level of care. Using a 99-item cross-sectional survey assessing four domains (hospital and physical IC features, provider and nurse staffing, monitoring, and interventions/services), we describe the organizational heterogeneity of IC within a five-hospital healthcare system. Surveys were completed by nurse managers from 12 (86%) of 14 IC settings. Six IC settings (50%) were embedded within acute care wards, four (33%) were stand-alone units, and two (17%) were embedded within an ICU. All had a nurse-to-patient ratio of 1:3, provided continuous cardiac telemetry, continuous pulse oximetry, high-flow nasal oxygen, and bedside intermittent hemodialysis. Most (> 50%) permitted arterial lines, frequent nursing assessments (every 2 hr), and noninvasive ventilation or mechanical ventilation via a tracheostomy. Vasopressors were less often permitted (< 25% of settings). Models of IC vary greatly within a single healthcare system.
AB - Intermediate care (IC) is prevalent nationwide, but little is known about how to best organize this level of care. Using a 99-item cross-sectional survey assessing four domains (hospital and physical IC features, provider and nurse staffing, monitoring, and interventions/services), we describe the organizational heterogeneity of IC within a five-hospital healthcare system. Surveys were completed by nurse managers from 12 (86%) of 14 IC settings. Six IC settings (50%) were embedded within acute care wards, four (33%) were stand-alone units, and two (17%) were embedded within an ICU. All had a nurse-to-patient ratio of 1:3, provided continuous cardiac telemetry, continuous pulse oximetry, high-flow nasal oxygen, and bedside intermittent hemodialysis. Most (> 50%) permitted arterial lines, frequent nursing assessments (every 2 hr), and noninvasive ventilation or mechanical ventilation via a tracheostomy. Vasopressors were less often permitted (< 25% of settings). Models of IC vary greatly within a single healthcare system.
KW - critical care
KW - critical care operations
KW - high-dependency care
KW - intermediate care
KW - progressive care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85216097636&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85216097636&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001201
DO - 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001201
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85216097636
SN - 2639-8028
VL - 7
SP - e1201
JO - Critical Care Explorations
JF - Critical Care Explorations
IS - 1
ER -