Heterogeneity of Intermediate Care Organization Within a Single Healthcare System

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Intermediate care (IC) is prevalent nationwide, but little is known about how to best organize this level of care. Using a 99-item cross-sectional survey assessing four domains (hospital and physical IC features, provider and nurse staffing, monitoring, and interventions/services), we describe the organizational heterogeneity of IC within a five-hospital healthcare system. Surveys were completed by nurse managers from 12 (86%) of 14 IC settings. Six IC settings (50%) were embedded within acute care wards, four (33%) were stand-alone units, and two (17%) were embedded within an ICU. All had a nurse-to-patient ratio of 1:3, provided continuous cardiac telemetry, continuous pulse oximetry, high-flow nasal oxygen, and bedside intermittent hemodialysis. Most (> 50%) permitted arterial lines, frequent nursing assessments (every 2 hr), and noninvasive ventilation or mechanical ventilation via a tracheostomy. Vasopressors were less often permitted (< 25% of settings). Models of IC vary greatly within a single healthcare system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e1201
JournalCritical Care Explorations
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 22 2025

Keywords

  • critical care
  • critical care operations
  • high-dependency care
  • intermediate care
  • progressive care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Heterogeneity of Intermediate Care Organization Within a Single Healthcare System'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this