TY - JOUR
T1 - Global epidemiology of hysterectomy
T2 - possible impact on gynecological cancer rates
AU - Hammer, Anne
AU - Rositch, Anne F.
AU - Kahlert, Johnny
AU - Gravitt, Patti E.
AU - Blaakaer, Jan
AU - Søgaard, Mette
N1 - Funding Information:
A.H. has received a nonrestricted grant (no. DKK 50,000) from Sanofi Pasteur MSD (Denmark). The other authors report no conflicts of interest.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Inc.
Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/7/1
Y1 - 2015/7/1
N2 - Despite the fact that hysterectomy is the most common surgical procedure worldwide in gynecology, national reporting of the incidence rate of gynecological cancers rarely removes the proportion no longer at risk of the disease from the population-at-risk-denominator (ie, women who have had a hysterectomy). The incidence rate of gynecological cancers is thus likely underestimated. Because hysterectomy, as well as oophorectomy, incidence varies across countries, age, and over time, meaningful comparison of gynecological cancer incidence rates may be compromised. Without accurate estimates of gynecological cancer incidence rates, performed via removing the proportion of hysterectomized or oophorectomized women from the population-at-risk-denominator, the impact of prevention strategies may be masked or misinterpreted. Furthermore, because national cervical cancer screening guidelines are at least in part based on the national reporting of cervical cancer incidence, it is important that the incidence rate reflects the true population at risk.
AB - Despite the fact that hysterectomy is the most common surgical procedure worldwide in gynecology, national reporting of the incidence rate of gynecological cancers rarely removes the proportion no longer at risk of the disease from the population-at-risk-denominator (ie, women who have had a hysterectomy). The incidence rate of gynecological cancers is thus likely underestimated. Because hysterectomy, as well as oophorectomy, incidence varies across countries, age, and over time, meaningful comparison of gynecological cancer incidence rates may be compromised. Without accurate estimates of gynecological cancer incidence rates, performed via removing the proportion of hysterectomized or oophorectomized women from the population-at-risk-denominator, the impact of prevention strategies may be masked or misinterpreted. Furthermore, because national cervical cancer screening guidelines are at least in part based on the national reporting of cervical cancer incidence, it is important that the incidence rate reflects the true population at risk.
KW - cervical cancer screening
KW - epidemiology
KW - gynecological cancer
KW - hysterectomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937514140&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937514140&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.02.019
DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.02.019
M3 - Article
C2 - 25724402
AN - SCOPUS:84937514140
SN - 0002-9378
VL - 213
SP - 23
EP - 29
JO - American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
JF - American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
IS - 1
M1 - 10278
ER -