Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Genital anaerobic bacterial overgrowth and the prepex male circumcision device, rakai, Uganda

  • Cindy M. Liu
  • , Jessica L. Prodger
  • , Aaron A.R. Tobian
  • , David Serwadda
  • , Ronald M. Galiwango
  • , Fred Nalugoda
  • , Nehemiah Kighoma
  • , Joshua Mwinike
  • , Margaret Anyokorit
  • , Lance B. Price
  • , Maria J. Wawer
  • , Godfrey Kigozi
  • , Ronald H. Gray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The PrePex circumcision device causes ischemic necrosis of the foreskin, raising concerns of anaerobic overgrowth. We compared the subpreputial microbiome of 2 men 7 days after PrePex device placement to that of 145 uncircumcised men in Rakai, Uganda, using 16S ribosomal (rRNA) RNA gene-based quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis and sequencing. Pre-Pex users had higher absolute abundance of all bacteria than uncircumcised men (P = .001), largely due to increased numbers of the following anaerobes: Porphyromonas (5.2 × 107 16S rRNA gene copies/swab in the PrePex group and 1.1 × 106 16S rRNA gene copies/swab in uncircumcised men; P = .002), Peptoniphilus (1.0 × 107 and 1.8 × 106 16S rRNA gene copies/swab, respectively; P < .05), Anaerococcus (1.0 × 107 and 1.1 × 106 16S rRNA gene copies/swab, respectively; P < .001), and Campylobacter ureolyticus (1.7 × 105 and 1.6 × 10716S rRNA gene copies/swab, respectively; P < .001). The PrePex-associated increase in anaerobes may account for unpleasant odor and a possible heightened risk of tetanus.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)595-598
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Infectious Diseases
Volume214
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 15 2016

Keywords

  • Anaerobes
  • Male circumcision
  • Penile microbiota
  • PrePex device
  • Tetanus
  • Uganda

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Genital anaerobic bacterial overgrowth and the prepex male circumcision device, rakai, Uganda'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this