Food, Gentrification and Located Life Plans

Matteo Bonotti, Anne Barnhill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Even though the phenomenon of gentrification is ever-growing in contemporary urban contexts, especially in high income countries, it has been mostly overlooked by normative political theorists and philosophers. In this paper we examine the normative dimensions of gentrification through the lens of food. By drawing on Huber and Wolkenstein’s (Huber and Wolkenstein, Politics, Philosophy & Economics 17:378–397, 2018) work, we use food as an example to illustrate the multiple ways in which life plans can be located and to argue that both existing residents and newcomers have an interest in occupancy rights. More specifically, while newcomers have an interest in moving freely to new neighbourhoods in order to purse their preferred life plans, they also have an interest in being able to continue to pursue those life plans once they have acquired them, and this requires occupancy rights and the implementation of measures aimed at regulating and slowing down gentrification. Moreover, when residents belong to already disadvantaged groups, more significant anti-gentrification measures can be implemented in order to prevent injustices from being compounded.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number8
JournalFood Ethics
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2022

Keywords

  • Food
  • Gentrification
  • Life Plans
  • Occupancy Rights

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Food, Gentrification and Located Life Plans'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this