TY - JOUR
T1 - Food environments around American indian reservations
T2 - A mixed methods study
AU - Chodur, Gwen M.
AU - Shen, Ye
AU - Kodish, Stephen
AU - Oddo, Vanessa M.
AU - Antiporta, Daniel A.
AU - Jock, Brittany
AU - Jones-Smith, Jessica C.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (Grant 4R00HD073327 and U54HD070725).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Chodur et al.
PY - 2016/8
Y1 - 2016/8
N2 - Objectives To describe the food environments experienced by American Indians living on tribal lands in California. Methods Geocoded statewide food business data were used to define and categorize existing food vendors into healthy, unhealthy, and intermediate composite categories. Distance to and density of each of the composite food vendor categories for tribal lands and nontribal lands were compared using multivariate linear regression. Quantitative results were concurrently triangulated with qualitative data from in-depth interviews with tribal members (n = 24). Results After adjusting for census tract-level urbanicity and per capita income, results indicate there were significantly fewer healthy food outlets per square mile for tribal areas compared to non-tribal areas. Density of unhealthy outlets was not significantly different for tribal versus non-tribal areas. Tribal members perceived their food environment negatively and reported barriers to the acquisition of healthy food. Conclusions Urbanicity and per capita income do not completely account for disparities in food environments among American Indians tribal lands compared to nontribal lands. This disparity in access to healthy food may present a barrier to acting on the intention to consume healthy food.
AB - Objectives To describe the food environments experienced by American Indians living on tribal lands in California. Methods Geocoded statewide food business data were used to define and categorize existing food vendors into healthy, unhealthy, and intermediate composite categories. Distance to and density of each of the composite food vendor categories for tribal lands and nontribal lands were compared using multivariate linear regression. Quantitative results were concurrently triangulated with qualitative data from in-depth interviews with tribal members (n = 24). Results After adjusting for census tract-level urbanicity and per capita income, results indicate there were significantly fewer healthy food outlets per square mile for tribal areas compared to non-tribal areas. Density of unhealthy outlets was not significantly different for tribal versus non-tribal areas. Tribal members perceived their food environment negatively and reported barriers to the acquisition of healthy food. Conclusions Urbanicity and per capita income do not completely account for disparities in food environments among American Indians tribal lands compared to nontribal lands. This disparity in access to healthy food may present a barrier to acting on the intention to consume healthy food.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991451203&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84991451203&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0161132
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0161132
M3 - Article
C2 - 27560132
AN - SCOPUS:84991451203
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 11
JO - PLoS One
JF - PLoS One
IS - 8
M1 - e0161132
ER -