Abstract
We recently argued (McCloskey, Wible, & Cohen, 1988) that the available evidence fails to warrant postulation of a special flashbulb memory mechanism. Although apparently agreeing with our conclusion, Pillemer (1990) criticizes us on a number of grounds. In this reply we address Pillemer's criticisms.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 97-100 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Journal of Experimental Psychology: General |
Volume | 119 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 1990 |
Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Psychology(all)
- Developmental Neuroscience