TY - JOUR
T1 - Feedback by Any Other Name Is Still Interactivity
T2 - A Reply to Roelofs (2004)
AU - Rapp, Brenda
AU - Goldrick, Matthew
PY - 2004/4
Y1 - 2004/4
N2 - In his comment, A. Roelofs claimed that a feedforward-only theory of spoken word production (WEAVER++) can account for certain basic facts of spoken word production that B. Rapp and M. Goldrick (2000) argued could not be accounted for by feedforward-only theories. Rapp and Goldrick argued that to account for these facts, mechanisms such as feedback and cascading activation are required. In this reply, the authors discuss difficulties with Roelofs's argumentation and point to recent relevant empirical evidence. The authors conclude that Roelofs failed to disprove Rapp and Goldrick's claims and, furthermore, failed to provide strong evidence of the specific feedback characteristics in WEAVER+ +.
AB - In his comment, A. Roelofs claimed that a feedforward-only theory of spoken word production (WEAVER++) can account for certain basic facts of spoken word production that B. Rapp and M. Goldrick (2000) argued could not be accounted for by feedforward-only theories. Rapp and Goldrick argued that to account for these facts, mechanisms such as feedback and cascading activation are required. In this reply, the authors discuss difficulties with Roelofs's argumentation and point to recent relevant empirical evidence. The authors conclude that Roelofs failed to disprove Rapp and Goldrick's claims and, furthermore, failed to provide strong evidence of the specific feedback characteristics in WEAVER+ +.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1942507473&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1942507473&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.573
DO - 10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.573
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:1942507473
SN - 0033-295X
VL - 111
SP - 573
EP - 578
JO - Psychological Review
JF - Psychological Review
IS - 2
ER -