Feasibility of clinical performance assessment of medical students on a virtual sub-internship in the United States

John Woller, Sean Tackett, Ariella Apfel, Janet Record, Danelle Cayea, Shannon Walker, Amit Pahwa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We aimed to determine whether it was feasible to assess medical students as they completed a virtual sub-internship. Six students (out of 31 who completed an in-person sub-internship) participated in a 2-week virtual sub-internship, caring for patients remotely. Residents and attendings assessed those 6 students in 15 domains using the same assessment measures from the in-person sub-internship. Raters marked "unable to assess"in 75/390 responses (19%) for the virtual sub-internship versus 88/3,405 (2.6%) for the in-person sub-internship (P=0.01), most frequently for the virtual sub-internship in the domains of the physical examination (21, 81%), rapport with patients (18, 69%), and compassion (11, 42%). Students received complete assessments in most areas. Scores were higher for the in-person than the virtual sub-internship (4.67 vs. 4.45, P<0.01) for students who completed both. Students uniformly rated the virtual clerkship positively. Students can be assessed in many domains in the context of a virtual sub-internship.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number12
JournalJournal of educational evaluation for health professions
Volume18
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2021

Keywords

  • Clinical clerkship
  • Distance education
  • Medical student
  • Undergraduate medical education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • General Health Professions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Feasibility of clinical performance assessment of medical students on a virtual sub-internship in the United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this