TY - JOUR
T1 - Family planning service disruptions in the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic
T2 - Evidence from health facilities in seven low- and middle-income countries
AU - Karp, Celia
AU - Williams, Kelsey
AU - Wood, Shannon N.
AU - OlaOlorun, Funmilola M.
AU - Akilimali, Pierre
AU - Guiella, Georges
AU - Gichangi, Peter
AU - Mosso, Rosine
AU - Makumbi, Frederick
AU - Anglewicz, Philip A.
AU - Moreau, Caroline
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Karp et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the originalauthor and source are credited.
PY - 2024/1
Y1 - 2024/1
N2 - Many speculated that COVID-19 would severely restrict the delivery of essential health services, including family planning (FP), but evidence of this impact is limited, partly due to data limitations. We use cross-sectional data collected from regional and national samples of health facilities (n = 2,610) offering FP across seven low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) between 2019 and 2021, with longitudinal data from four geographies, to examine reported disruptions to the FP service environment during COVID-19, assess how these disruptions varied according to health system characteristics, and evaluate how disruptions evolved throughout the first two years of the pandemic, relative to a pre-pandemic period. Findings show significant variation in the impact of COVID-19 on facility-based FP services across LMICs, with the largest disruptions to services occurring in Rajasthan, India, where COVID-19 cases were highest among geographies sampled, while in most sub-Saharan African settings there were limited disruptions impacting FP service availability, method provision, and contraceptive supplies. Facility-reported disruptions to care were not reflected in observed changes to the number of FP clients or types of stockouts experienced in the first two years of the pandemic. Public and higher-level facilities were generally less likely to experience COVID-19-related disruptions to FP services, suggesting policy mitigation measures—particularly those implemented among government-operated health facilities—may have been critical to ensuring sustained delivery of reproductive healthcare during the pandemic.
AB - Many speculated that COVID-19 would severely restrict the delivery of essential health services, including family planning (FP), but evidence of this impact is limited, partly due to data limitations. We use cross-sectional data collected from regional and national samples of health facilities (n = 2,610) offering FP across seven low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) between 2019 and 2021, with longitudinal data from four geographies, to examine reported disruptions to the FP service environment during COVID-19, assess how these disruptions varied according to health system characteristics, and evaluate how disruptions evolved throughout the first two years of the pandemic, relative to a pre-pandemic period. Findings show significant variation in the impact of COVID-19 on facility-based FP services across LMICs, with the largest disruptions to services occurring in Rajasthan, India, where COVID-19 cases were highest among geographies sampled, while in most sub-Saharan African settings there were limited disruptions impacting FP service availability, method provision, and contraceptive supplies. Facility-reported disruptions to care were not reflected in observed changes to the number of FP clients or types of stockouts experienced in the first two years of the pandemic. Public and higher-level facilities were generally less likely to experience COVID-19-related disruptions to FP services, suggesting policy mitigation measures—particularly those implemented among government-operated health facilities—may have been critical to ensuring sustained delivery of reproductive healthcare during the pandemic.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85195517015&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85195517015&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002435
DO - 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002435
M3 - Article
C2 - 38180911
AN - SCOPUS:85195517015
SN - 2767-3375
VL - 4
JO - PLOS Global Public Health
JF - PLOS Global Public Health
IS - 1 January
M1 - e0002435
ER -